ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Industry watch Toolkit

Court resists trend in Net address case

Paul Festa CNET News.com CNet

Published: 06 Sep 2001 10:56 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

In a rare victory for an individual domain name owner, a federal court has thrown out the cybersquatting claims of a truck manufacturer against a computer consultant.

The case pitted Strick, a truck manufacturer based in Fairless Hills, Pennsylvania, against James "Strick" Strickland, a Florida-based computer consultant who registered the domain name in 1995.

Strick has been battling to acquire the Web address since 1996, when it took its case to domain name registrar Network Solutions. NSI put the domain on hold from January 1997 until January 2000, when it restored names on hold to their original owners unless they faced renewed challenges.

The truck manufacturer lodged just such a challenge with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, which oversees the Internet address system. Argued before the National Arbitration Forum, the case was decided in favour of the computer consultant. In June 2000, the company filed suit with the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, whose 27 August summary judgment handed another victory to Strickland.

The case is unusual, said a lawyer for Strickland, because in most cases of this type courts have ruled in favour of companies, which have been seen as targets of profiteering "cybersquatters" trying to exact payments for domain names.

"The court cases where a judge explicitly recognises that the domain name owner did nothing wrong are few and far between," said attorney Carl Oppedahl of Oppedahl & Larson. "This is one of only a tiny handful of such cases.

"This one, together with the Clue case, marks the beginning of the end for covetous parties who try to misuse the legal system to take domain names away from innocent owners."

The truck manufacturer could not immediately be reached for comment. It has until 28 September to decide whether to appeal the District Court's decision.

See the Internet News Section for full coverage.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the Telecoms forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
33 out of 86 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal