Dot-com investor wins payout over biased analyst claims
Published: 24 Jul 2001 12:04 BST
A US investor has won a £275,000 payout from investment bank Merrill Lynch after claiming he had been deliberately misled by one of its top Internet analysts.
Debases Kankilal, a doctor based in New York, claimed that "overly bullish" research published by Henry Blodget cost him around £350,000. Kankilal alleged that Blodget recommended buying shares in Web firm InfoSpace so that Merrill Lynch received banking fees from the firm.
Blodget had backed InfoSpace shares as a good investment even as they began to fall from their top value of around $132. A InfoSpace share is now worth around $3.30 -- less than three percent of its top value.
Merrill Lynch was not involved in InfoSpace's IPO, but according to Reuters the bank did work with a second Web company that was subsequently bought by InfoSpace. Kankilal claimed that this meant Merrill Lynch had a potential conflict of interest.
Merrill Lynch had previously strongly denied that Blodget -- who made his name by predicting that Amazon shares would reach $400 -- was at fault. Despite paying up, the company does not admit any wrongdoing. "The matter was resolved to avoid the expense and distraction of protracted litigation," said the investment bank in a statement.
Since the dot-com crash last year, many analysts have been accused of hyping Internet stocks that were already over-valued. Merrill Lynch's move seems likely to lead to other such damages claims. Kankilal's lawyers have already said they are considering claims against two other analysts -- Mary Meeker of Morgan Stanley and Salomon Smith Barney's Jack Grubman.
See techTrader for the latest technology business news.
Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the techTrader forum
Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.
Did you find this article useful?
42 out of 79 people found this useful
Digg
Slashdot
Del.ici.ous
Stumble
Reddit
