ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Microsoft to put price, date on Xbox at E3

David Becker CNet

Published: 14 May 2001 15:00 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Battle plans will take shape this week in the video game wars, as Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo square off at the Electronic Entertainment Expo (E3) trade show in Los Angeles.

Microsoft will be counting on the annual fete to build buzz for its upcoming Xbox game console. The company is set to announce a price and a sale date for the Xbox, the last two major pieces of information to emerge about the device. Analysts expect the company will match Sony's $300 (£299) price tag for the PlayStation 2.

"They've got to come in [priced] equal to or less than the PS2," Gartner analyst, PJ McNealy said. "They're a new entrant in this market, and they have a chance to make a first impression, only once."

Nintendo, meanwhile, will try to prove it's still a serious contender in the console market with its upcoming GameCube. (Not to mention the video technology company promising details on "Britney Spears' first foray into the interactive entertainment industry.")

Top representatives of the three console makers will make their cases in a keynote address, set to kick off the event Thursday morning, but specific plans will be revealed in press conferences the day before.

While gamers will be focused on Microsoft's announcement, the price picture could get fuzzier if Sony decides to lower the cost of the PS2. By the time the Xbox hits the market, PS2 will be celebrating its first anniversary.

A price cut could further pressure Microsoft. Because of the standard video game practice of counting on software royalties to subsidise hardware costs, Microsoft is expected to lose up to $125 (£88)on every Xbox it sells, making the company less likely to match Sony on any price cuts.

"If you're selling millions of units, cutting $20 (£14) off the price is a big deal," IDC analyst, Schelley Olhava said.

While Microsoft has to establish its credentials in the game industry, Nintendo may face an even bigger challenge convincing gamers it's serious with the GameCube. The console, once dubbed "Dolphin," was originally scheduled to be on shelves more than a year ago, as the successor to Nintendo's long-in-the-tooth N64. Persistent delays mean that if the GameCube comes out late this year, as planned, it risks becoming a sideline attraction to the war between Sony and Microsoft.

"They really need to show everyone that this product is going to come out as promised, Olhava said. "As it keeps getting delayed, they're losing windows of opportunity."

But Nintendo's competitors don't have a lock on handheld gaming, as Nintendo does with its Game Boy line. The new Game Boy Advance -- available in Japan and set to go on sale June 11 in the United States -- will connect with the GameCube to transfer game data, act as a spare controller and perform other functions.

It's the first time Nintendo has tried to transfer its handheld dominance to the console market. Combined with a few strong franchise titles, such as a new "Mario" game and a selling price expected to be in the low-$200 range, Nintendo should at least be able to maintain its grip on gamers, 12 years old and younger, long considered the company's key demographic.

"All they have to do is market the GameCube to the people who own a Game Boy Advance, and they've got a pretty good audience," McNealy said, adding that the beefier hardware in the Xbox and PlayStation 2 shouldn't be much of a barrier for Nintendo.

"They're marketing to a different audience," he said. "The 12-and-under crowd doesn't care about processor speed and hard drive size. They care about Pokemon and what will it do with my Game Boy."

While prices and hardware specs are important details in positioning consoles for the market, the biggest challenge at E3 is to deliver on software. Demonstrations of lots of good-looking, high-quality games are essential to convince gamers that a new console has the right stuff.

"I think it's critical to have some games that really show off the platform," Olhava said. "And that applies to all of them. Sony needs to show some games that really push PS2 forward."

E3 is important for building buzz around a new console, McNealy agreed, but not critical, especially if you have Microsoft's $500m (£352.6m) marketing budget to throw around.

"It certainly helps to get a good response at E3, but it's not a make-or-break proposition," he said. "If Microsoft absolutely bombs with their demos at E3, they're still not slitting their throats."

Sony had a pretty weak response to the PlayStation 2 at last year's E3, McNealy noted, but by the time the console went on sale, consumers were lining up for blocks and paying huge premiums to get their hands on one.

E3 "is significant to the hard-core gamer; it's not significant to the general consumer," McNealy said. "The general consumer doesn't even know what E3 is."

For complete business coverage, see ZDNet UK's Enterprise Channel.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
32 out of 63 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:










Discussions

1000030281 1000030281

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Sunday 20 July 2008, 2:33 AM

1 comment
roger andre roger andre

SP3 Under Suspicion Again

Saturday 19 July 2008, 9:29 PM

2 comments

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal