Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Scotland loses as .scot.uk bid is turned down

Wendy McAuliffe ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 04 May 2001 14:36 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Scotland may be devolved politically, but it will remain tied to .uk in the virtual world if Nominet has its way

The official registry for UK domain names has rejected an application to create a new second-level domain (SLD), .scot.uk, intended to identify Scottish businesses online.

Non-profit making company ScotNom was the first to apply for a SLD in under the .uk country code. But Nominet's executive appears unwilling to relinquish control of any part of the UK domain, and has recommended that the proposal is rejected in its present form because it "fails to comply with the stated policy in several key areas".

ScotNom, whose members include Cap Gemini, Ernst and Young and Scotsman.com, is requesting that it be allowed to manage the Scottish SLD, with registry operations delegated to Scotland Online. The domains would be priced at £10 for two years for members or £80 for non-members. Membership would be £500 to join and then £100 a year to renew.

Within its application, ScotNom argues "this new SLD would be beneficial to users, or potential users of UK namespace and the Internet community as a whole. In particular, it would be beneficial to Scottish users and those associated with Scotland, or wishing to target the Scottish market."

The application argues there is limited space in .uk, especially .co.uk, and mentions that the .us domain is sub-divided into geographical areas.

The Nominet executive has indicated that the application is more likely to succeed if ScotNom hands over the control of .scot.uk to Nominet, who already controls .co.uk and .org.uk. It is currently claiming that the proposal does not comply with the requirement for a third party registry to "demonstrate it as a suitably neutral and impartial body by a significant number of potential Registrants in the SLD, and that it can comply with the policy."

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
65 out of 116 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Discussions

J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Copyright in a new light

Thursday 17 December 2009, 8:42 PM

1 comment
lezlow lezlow

POORLY PRIZES

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:48 PM

1 comment
lezlow lezlow

me to

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:28 PM

6 comments
lezlow lezlow

no number

Thursday 17 December 2009, 7:25 PM

3 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters