Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

MPs slam government over digital divide plans

Jane Wakefield ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 27 Mar 2001 12:23 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The government's UK online plans to close the digital divide have been severely critised in a select committee report.

The report, from the same Trade and Industry select committee which last week attacked the government's attempts to open up BT's network, is hugely critical of the work being done to prevent a digital divide in Britain and is sceptical of how much recently-appointed e-envoy Andrew Pinder is helping the cause. It will come as a blow to a government determined to prevent a digital divide in Britain and promote e-business as the best in Europe.

The report accuses government of having no coherent strategy to combat the digital divide and describes various projects intended to give equal access to the Internet as "futile gestures".

"The initiative centres and development programmes do not amount to a strategy to overcome the digital divide between old and young, rich and poor, urban and rural," the report concludes. "In the context of the scale of the digital divide, they look like woefully inadequate gestures. Millions of people are excluded, not the thousands reached so far by these initiatives."

The MPs are equally damning of the job being done by e-envoy Andrew Pinder, who is charged with promoting e-business, combatting the digital divide and getting all government services online by 2005. Instead, Pinder has become embroiled in red tape, the report finds. "The e-envoy has been absorbed into the machinery of Whitehall and is now an adjunct of the e-Minister," the report concludes. "We are concerned at this mini-empire growing up in the shadow of the e-envoy. We greatly fear that the original concept of the e-envoy has been captured, tamed and bureaucratised into an e-official planted in an e-office, no doubt full of activity but caught between being an agency of implementation and powerhouse of ideas."

The criticisms will be hugely embarrassing for the government in the run up to the general election. It is not the first time its digital divide strategy has been questioned. A Department of Culture, Media and Sport select committee earlier this month accused the government of developing broadband plans in isolation from citizen's needs. Critics have long questioned how much impact government projects will have on preventing a society of information haves and havenots.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
56 out of 89 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:











Discussions

CarlBrummy CarlBrummy

Enough already

Monday 16 November 2009, 9:36 AM

53 comments
NoThomas NoThomas

I appreciate your comments...

Monday 16 November 2009, 2:42 AM

15 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters