Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

IR35 could cost companies billions in benefits

Graeme Wearden ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 21 Mar 2001 08:31 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Companies could be forced to pay billions of pounds in benefits to IT contractors if the IR35 taxes rules aren't overturned.

Mr Justice Burton, who is hearing a judicial review brought by the Professional Contractors Group (PCG), said in court that a self-employed contractor who was treated as an employee for tax purposes by the Inland Revenue should also be entitled to employee benefits. According to Burton, it would be illogical for a consultant's income to be taxed at the level of an employee -- a higher rate than for the turnover of a company -- without the consultant receiving the benefits enjoyed by a full-time member of staff.

According to benefits specialists, if companies had to pay sick leave and holiday entitlement to self-employed IT workers, it could cost a total of £2bn each year. There are an estimated 90,000 self-employed high-tech contractors in the UK.

Under IR35 -- which came into force in April 2000 -- the Inland Revenue can decide to treat the turnover of an IT contractor or a small business as salary. The PCG claims that it is illegal under European Law, because it is effectively state aid for larger companies -- who would pay less tax than a small contractor firms caught by IR35.

According to the PCG, thousands of IT workers will be forced to leave the UK if IR35 goes ahead, damaging the UK's position in the global Internet economy. It brought the judicial review against the Inland Revenue in the hope of getting the tax rule overturned.

COMMENT
Closing the loopholes in IR35

The laws to discourage tax dodging, should not go so far that they make it better for people to leave the country and work offshore. Guy Kewney isn't sure whether abandoning IR35 altogether is the answer -- but it certainly needs some serious tidying up.

For complete business coverage, see ZDNet UK's Enterprise Channel.

Take me to ZDNet's Small Business Special.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
44 out of 80 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Discussions

CA CA

Questions over pub Wi-Fi case remain u...

Thursday 10 December 2009, 9:05 PM

1 comment
lezlow lezlow

brucie baby

Thursday 10 December 2009, 8:33 PM

1 comment
CA CA

NHS spend on IT - How would you make s...

Thursday 10 December 2009, 8:28 PM

4 comments
sjh777 sjh777

Copper tax?

Thursday 10 December 2009, 1:16 PM

1 comment
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters