ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Financial watchdog threatens Y2K laggards with closure

Jane Wakefield ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 12 Jul 1999 14:14 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Speaking today at Action 2000's National Infrastructure Forum, managing director of the Financial Services Authority (FSA) Michael Foot warned that the time for tough decisions was approaching if customers' interests were to be protected. Another review of progress is expected in the autumn.

"When and where needed, regulatory action will follow," Foot threatened.

Currently, under Action 2000's colour-coded system of measuring Y2K preparedness, 66 percent of high impact financial services are blue (no risk of bug disruption), 32 percent are amber (some risk) and 2 percent are red (severe risk).

The FSA's remit covers high-street banks, insurance companies, building societies, stockbrokers and investment banks. 450 firms have been identified as companies that will impact their sector, the survey found.

The Authority has the power to restrict new business, force firms to transfer clients to Y2K compliant companies and, in the worse case scenario, close businesses. An FSA spokesman described a "forced merger" as the most likely outcome of firms still in Action 2000's red category by the end of September.

The FSA has backed down from naming and shaming the laggards at this stage. Foot claimed it would not be in the interests of policy-holders, depositors and investors. "It's a question of how you square naming with the gratuitous lack of confidence such naming would bring about," he said. Questioned on why eight major financial institutions are still not up to speed on the bug, Foot blamed the complexity of the task. "It is no Mickey Mouse job getting systems ready. It is a huge amount of work and money," he said.

Foot highlighted the 66 percent of companies that have completed their Year 2000 programmes and reassured customers that assets would be protected under existing compensation policies. He is confident there will be no major disruptions for customers. "I shall not be cancelling policies or taking money out and putting it under the bed," he said.

Spokespeople from both the NatWest and Lloyds TSB claimed it would "be business as usual" come Dec 31, 1999. It is not thought any major high-street bank is among the eight red-listed companies

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
41 out of 81 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:








Related Jobs

INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER

Performing regular Information Security risk assessment and developing mitigation strategies for identified risk. INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER 32,436 ...

Oracle Support/Developer

CORE COMPETENCE/EXPERIENCE: The post-holders will be team players who demonstrate the following skills/experience: - Experience of development ...

Principal Applications Specialists

At present an opportunity has arisen to appoint a number of Principal Applications Specialists to provide effective leadership to either the project ...

Discussions

Tezzer Tezzer

Telescopic oversight

Saturday 17 May 2008, 1:21 PM

4 comments
61320 61320

Bletchley Park

Saturday 17 May 2008, 9:28 AM

5 comments

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal