ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Quarter of UK's small firms reject technology

Tim Kelly ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 11 Nov 1998 16:50 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Small businesses will "leave themselves dangerously vulnerable" if they do not accept new technology. NOP Research Group was commissioned by Cisco Systems to show the effects of large corporations insisting that clients and suppliers match their own IT infrastructures.

A survey of six countries -- UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, and the Czech Republic -- found 20 per cent of European small businesses, 25 per cent of UK small businesses and a third of German small businesses have effectively rejected technology. Goran Strandberg, European director for small and medium businesses at Cisco warned, "If they do not wake up, they are going to lose business."

The report uncovered five ‘typologies': rejecters, technophiles, islands, sharers and worriers. Island types, who see technology's benefits but have yet to build the required electronic ‘bridges' with their clients and suppliers, Worriers, who are concerned that technology will leave them behind and that staff will not be able to grasp developing technology, and Rejecters stand to lose the most.

Those who dare, and subsequently win, are Technophiles, whose business is fully dependent on technology, and Sharers, people who have adapted quickly to technological developments and identify strongly with the need to share information.

Cisco claims cost and a lack of technological knowledge were the two main barriers. Many people found technology to be "daunting, evolution as opposed to revolution."

Cliff Condon, research director for industry analyst Forrester Research, Amsterdam, agreed that one of the main deterrents was cost. He quoted on line charges as a case in point, saying that they were, "a deterrent... a flat rate fee would obviously be preferred."

Strandberg was hopeful for the future: "Growth of companies adopting technology is very rapid and in the future we will see a drop in the percentage of Rejecters."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
33 out of 67 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Procurement Manager, Cost Control, Bid Management, Telecoms, London

You will report to the Director of Supplier Management & he must be able to trust to you, as he will delegate some of his work to you e.g.meeting new ...

Firewalls Engineer Lead

Identify and implement enhancements to the production environment. Identify any tasks outside of Core Operational Services, setting customer ...

Associate Director of Business Intelligence

To maintain a number of external key relationships with the local Care Community, Connecting for Health and with Siemens and key IT Suppliers. ...

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal