ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

A Year Ago: DOJ asks for $1m a day fine on Microsoft

Michael Moeller ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 20 Oct 1998 06:29 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Microsoft Corp. is in violation of its 1995 consent decree.

In a complaint filed in federal court in the District of Columbia, the department asked the court to hold Microsoft in civil contempt for forcing PC makers to bundle the Internet Explorer browser with PCs that come with Windows 95.

The department is asking the court to fine Microsoft $1 million for every day it is in violation.

According to the department, the consent decree stated that Microsoft was prohibited from forcing computer makers to license any other Microsoft product as a condition of licensing Windows 95.

"Microsoft is unlawfully taking advantage of its Windows monopoly to protect and extend that monopoly," Attorney General Janet Reno told reporters.

PC Week Online reported in August 1996 that several PC makers alleged that Microsoft had wielded its operating-system dominance unfairly in an attempt to push Internet Explorer to the top of the browser market.

Microsoft plans to hold a press conference today at 3:30 p.m. ET.

"We are confident that we have operated in a completely appropriate and lawful manner. The facts will show that we are in full compliance with the consent decree," said Microsoft spokesperson Mark Murray. "The consent decree specifically says that we are able to integrate new features into the operating systems.

"Consumers want that, and that is how the software market has been operating for years," Murray added. "Consumers have always had the freedom to choose any browser. Netscape [Communications Corp.'s Communicator] operates exactly as Netscape designed it on the Windows platform, and we have never stopped any other browser from being used on our platform."

Microsoft officials have long maintained that Internet Explorer is a feature of the OS rather than a separate product.

In its petition, the Justice Department asks that the court:

· stop Microsoft from requiring PC manufacturers to accept Internet Explorer as a condition of receiving Windows 95;

· require Microsoft to notify consumers of PCs with Windows 95 that they are not obligated to use IE, that they are free to use any compatible Internet browser and that the company will give consumers simple instructions about how to remove the IE icon from the PC desktop if they choose;

· impose large daily files--$1 million—on Microsoft if it continues to violate the court order;

· strike down broad portions of the nondisclosure agreement that Microsoft requires those with whom it does business to sign.

Microsoft, of Redmond, Wash., has 11 days to reply to the charges.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
1 out of 2 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Java Developer - Glasgow, Scotland (Java Developer Software Engineer x 2)

If you are interested in our Java Developer vacanices, please press the APPLY button below: Medium-Sized Business of the Year Award, we are currently ...

Business Analyst x 2 - London, South East

Application process: If you are interested in joining Corus as a Business Analyst, please press the apply button, indicating your preferred role. The ...

IT / Computing / Engineering Graduate Vacancies - KBP

If you are interested in our vacancies, please press the APPLY button below. Or application forms and further details available from the Human ...

Discussions

roger andre roger andre

Where IT's @!

Wednesday 23 July 2008, 10:08 PM

2 comments
3boomer7 3boomer7

Linux, Laptops and Dual Displays

Wednesday 23 July 2008, 9:31 PM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal