ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Industry watch Toolkit

US Report: HP's Tit-for-tat lawsuit hits Xerox

Margaret Kane ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 29 May 1998 15:38 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

HP has also asked the U.S. District Court in San Francisco for a permanent injunction, barring Xerox from using any of the technology in its copiers. The suit comes just two weeks after Xerox filed a patent suit of its own against HP. That suit accuses HP of violating Xerox patents related to ink-jet printers.

HP officials said the suit was not filed in retaliation. "Their case caused us to review our patents vs. their product portfolio, and we discovered their unauthorised use of our technology," said an HP spokeswoman. "We believe their suit is without merit and we were surprised by it."

HP's suit involves a patent titled "Touch-screen two-dimensional emulation of three-dimensional objects." HP has asked for an injunction against Xerox's production of the Document Centre 220, 230 and 265 copiers, the 5799, 5800 and 5855 models, and the DocuColor 40 copier, the spokeswoman said.

HP is also seeking unspecified damages. Xerox officials said they hadn't yet seen the complaint and had no comment.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
42 out of 97 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Discussions

J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

It's Not A Secret

Tuesday 7 October 2008, 1:46 PM

3 comments
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Loss of Credibility

Tuesday 7 October 2008, 1:11 PM

4 comments

Featured Talkback

In association with Intel
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal