ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

DOJ seeks contempt order against Microsoft

ZDNN, US ZDNet US

Published: 18 Dec 1997 11:46 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Department of Justice filed papers yesterday with US District Court Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson asking that Microsoft Corp. be held in civil contempt for not complying with his order barring the company from forcing OEMs to bundle the Internet Explorer browser with Windows 95.

The DOJ claims Microsoft's steps to comply with last week's preliminary injunction have thus far been insufficient.

At a briefing held yesterday afternoon in Washington, one DOJ official accused Microsoft of making "an absolute mockery of the preliminary injunction."

The department is also asking the court to force Microsoft to make available to computer manufacturers the most current version of Windows 95, with Internet Explorer uninstalled.

"Microsoft has gone from tying its products to tying the hands of its vendors," said Joel Klein, head of the anti-trust division at the DOJ. "The more Microsoft continues this practice, the more consumers are harmed."

Jackson's preliminary injunction last Thursday requires Microsoft to "cease and desist" from forcing OEMs to bundle any version of Internet Explorer with Windows 95.

To comply with Jackson's order, Microsoft announced on Monday that it is offering OEMs three choices: the current Windows 95, including IE; a two-year-old version; or a version of the OS that doesn't contain the IE files but that won't operate properly.

At the same time, Microsoft said it would appeal Jackson's order.

The DOJ said it is also asking Jackson to require the Redmond, Wash., company to notify the DOJ 30 days before it releases any updated version of its operating system or browsers. The department said it made the request because Microsoft was not complying in good faith with the injunction.

In addition, the DOJ is asking that the court fine Microsoft $1 million for each day it is in violation of the judge's order, saying Microsoft could comply with the original order if it wanted to.

Inter@ctive Week's Will Rodger, ZDNN's Michael Fitzgerald and PC Week's Michael Moeller contributed to this story.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
55 out of 110 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Help Desk Support - Cheshire

For an immediate start, please contact Michael My Cheshire based customer requires a Helpdesk analyst to work a 3-6 month contract. You will have ...

VB6 / SQL Server 2000 Development MTS/COM+ - 27 per hour

Visual Basic 6, SQL Server 2000, MTS/COM+ and full life cycle including testing VB6 / SQL Server 2000 Development MTS/COM+ A health client based in ...

Design Engineer, Avon

The role will include taking responsibility for quality; performance and reliability within all aspects of component and product design, ensuring ...

Discussions

Moley Moley

welcome to www.007trader.com

Saturday 17 May 2008, 11:37 PM

3 posts
Tallin Tallin

welcome to www.007trader.com

Saturday 17 May 2008, 11:11 PM

3 posts
Moley Moley

Pride

Saturday 17 May 2008, 10:10 PM

6 comments

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal