Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

MPEG-4, VRML 2.0 breathe life into avatars

Asher Rospigliosi ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 15 Aug 1997 08:00 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Between now and September 24, the VRML/MPEG-4 liaison WG working group is to raise a list of requirements for the MPEG committee, from the VRML community. The working group was formed in the aftermath of SIGRAPH 97 (Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics).

MPEG (Moving Picture Expert Group) is a working group of the ISO (International Standards Organisation) in charge of the development of international standards for compression, decompression, processing, and coding the representation of moving pictures, audio and their combination. Currently MPEG-2 consists of compression for video, but MPEG-4 will include specialised routines for face encoding, body movement encoding, and 3D data. According to Rob Koenen author of the >MPEG-4 Overview, it is already "heavily influenced by VRML".

MPEG-4 is to be released in November 1998 and will become an International Standard in January 1999.

VRML (Virtual Reality Modeling Language) has evolved as the de facto standard for the transmission of 3D data over the Internet. VRML has progressed from describing static 3D scenes, to the description of animations and sound. The next step is to standardise avatar support (multi-user representation). These plans centre around the need for common protocols for carrying voice, face and body data.

This overlap has raised the prospect of a joint standard. For the end-user this will bring a multi-user environment, in which face, voice and body motion can be streamed, whether for a worldwide interactive presentation, or even for deathmatch Quake where the players' voices and facial expressions are represented in the game.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
47 out of 87 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Discussions

CA CA

Well..

Thursday 17 December 2009, 12:51 AM

2 comments
CA CA

The sooner...

Thursday 17 December 2009, 12:42 AM

1 comment
CA CA

aye..

Thursday 17 December 2009, 12:30 AM

4 comments
CA CA

Mission accomplished..

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 10:09 PM

2 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters