ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Industry watch Toolkit

Q&A: Toshiba's Seabrook on desktop PCs

Martin Veitch ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 03 Jun 1997 15:04 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Last week, on the eve of Toshiba's launch into desktop PCs, PCDN met up with Howard Seabrook, desktop business manager for the Japanese firm's PC division. Foir the last 18 months, Seabrook has been formulating his plan and in that time has developed some interesting ideas about the consumer sector and what it takes to win in business PCs.

The original plan was to launch a consumer PC first. Why did you U-turn on that and go for a business range instead, especially given the consensus that the market is saturated with brands?

Desktops is a highly competitive market. You only have to look at how most PC brands are doing, and you'll see they aren't doing well, especially those that that don't have an international presence or haven't achieved critical mass.

Business is definitely a more attractive market. In the US we had built up a very strong retail channel so we went with consumer first. In the UK, we have some pretty good links with the retail channel - it's about eight to 10 per cent of our volumes so there were very good signals there, but when we actually started to look at it...

Fundamentally, we came to the decision that it's almost impossible to make money retailing consumer PCs which is a pity as [Toshiba's consumer PC brand in the US] Infinia is in its second generation with MMX chips, DVD drives and so on. And Tosh is a great brand in audio, microwave and other electric goods; almost a quarter of UK households have a Toshiba product.

We feel very much more comfortable in business-to-business. Retail is typically small business. The market is very crowded but there is room, although not for everyone. You have to be bringing something more than a box.

But there are plenty of firms out there offering more than a box, as you put it...

The sensible third alternative is weak: firms like AST and Olivetti that have had well publicised problems. Dealers don't want to leave the door open to Dell but people don't want to rely on one brand. We want it to be about two per cent of desktops in 12 months. That's 3,000-3,500 desktops per month. We're confident there's space in the market for us to achieve that.

What will the channel look like?

The channel is exactly the same as the existing one - no hint of direct. Our T's and C's are very stable. If there's a perception that we're expensive it's because we're not in the cheap and cheerful part of the market, but we're in lots of different margin businesses from mail-order firms to big resellers. We're competing with the people who are top in our channel: HP, Compaq, IBM.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
21 out of 64 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Discussions

0xyGen 0xyGen

Please help me in choosing web hosting

Sunday 20 July 2008, 10:32 AM

1 post
1000030281 1000030281

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Sunday 20 July 2008, 2:33 AM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal