ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Industry watch Toolkit

Intel heads for courtroom double date

Martin Veitch ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 15 May 1997 11:41 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Intel is heading for a double date in the courtroom after saying it sees both this week's Digital and Cyrix lawsuits as being without merit.

Yesterday, Intel issued a statement relating to the Digital lawsuit, stating: "[Intel] does not believe any of its products infringe on patents asserted by [Digital] ... [Digital] has stated that technology is vital to its business. Technology is vital to Intel's business as well. Over the past three years, Intel has been issued nearly 1,000 patents for semiconductor, microprocessor and other technologies. In conjunction with this effort, during that same period, Intel has spent over $4 billion for research and development."

Today, an Intel UK spokeswoman responded to Cyrix's lawsuit, also relating to patent infringements in recent processors: "We've concluded a preliminary examination of the patents and have concluded that Intel products don't infringe on these patents," she said. "The next step, I guess, is we'll be looking at a hearing."

The Cyrix suit was issued on Wednesday and refers to patents that it was granted earlier that day. The patents cover "externally controllable power management" and register renaming.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
42 out of 103 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Discussions

Tezzer Tezzer

Wot?

Saturday 30 August 2008, 12:04 AM

3 comments
Tezzer Tezzer

Ofcom to consider customer termination...

Saturday 30 August 2008, 12:03 AM

1 comment

Featured Talkback

When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal