Advertisement
Promo

Industry watch Toolkit

Mystery over Psion/Amstrad merger collapse

Martin Veitch ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 29 Jul 1996 13:13 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The £234 million UK mega-merger was called off Friday about 3pm after a month of discussion when Psion chiefs said they had decided not to go ahead. Both parties said they didn't expect the deal to be resuscitated. Amstrad was surprised by the collapse, saying it hadn't expected any last-minute hitches.

Amstrad's official announcement stated that "it was not possible to reach agreement on the price at which such an offer should be made. The Board of Amstrad is not aware of anything that has come to Psion's attention as a result of Psion's due diligence investigations that should concern Amstrad's shareholders."

Amstrad chief Alan Sugar was reported in The Times on Saturday that Psion had got "cold feet" over the deal. A Psion spokeman denied that was the case, saying: "Psion is not really talking about why or what. Having got all the information, we decided the deal wasn't in the best interests of our shareholders. It wasn't a matter of 'cold feet'; cold feet is the wrong implication to draw."

A spokeswoman at Viglen, the direct sales PC operation, owned by Amstrad, said that it was "business as usual" and claimed there had been no disturbance to sales while sale negotiations were going on.

PCDN COMMENT:

This deal always seemed to have rocky elements. Psion has no history of big-money deal-making and would have been forced to pick up a great deal more than the digital communications know-how that were clearly the chief appeal. Perhaps it was disagreement regarding the value of those other Amstrad operations that were alien to Psion (notably Viglen) that sparked problems. The end result is that Psion will look elsewhere to boost its comms offerings and Amstrad should continue its impressive revival. Certainly it looks better positioned, better balanced, and better funded than at any point in the last few years. With Alan Sugar still at the helm, it would be a brave soul who bet against the Essex stunner reinventing itself in yet another profitable guise.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
69 out of 121 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Discussions

CA CA

Mission accomplished..

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 10:09 PM

2 comments
KuleRucket KuleRucket

Why?

Wednesday 16 December 2009, 6:50 PM

2 comments
Video icon

Video

Featured Talkback

In association with Network Liberation Movement
When all is said, if Microsoft produce the best product people will buy it and thats a good thing. If people have to buy their product because no one else can produce an alternative, only because interoperability protocols are kept secret, then thats a bad thing.

By: pround

Read full story:
EU court crushes Microsoft's antitrust appeal


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters