ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Malware spoofs search sites

Alorie Gilbert CNET News.com

Published: 03 Oct 2005 09:40 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Security experts have discovered a malicious program aimed at tricking users into clicking on phoney search results on fake Google, Yahoo and MSN sites.

People with infected machines who try to visit those popular search sites are redirected to spoof versions, antivirus company Panda Software said Friday. The spoof sites serve up bogus search results intended to generate traffic and revenue for other sites that are presumed to be in on the scheme, said Patrick Hinojosa, Panda's chief technology officer.

"This is a business; this is organised crime," Hinojosa said. "People are making money on it."

Representatives from Google, Microsoft and Yahoo did not immediately return inquiries for comment.

Machines can become infected with the program, called PremiumSearch, when visiting Web sites that distribute pirated software and pornography, Panda reported. Hinojosa said he doesn't know how many machines have been infected.

Besides altered search results, the spoof sites are indistinguishable from the original version, the company said. The program also installs a fake Google toolbar that similarly interferes with results.

Hinojosa said Panda notified ISP that is hosting the spoof sites in the United States. He declined to name the ISP, noting that it might have already shut the sites down. Panda also notified federal authorities, including the FBI, he said.

Panda, which is based in Bilbao, Spain, makes software to combat viruses, worms, spyware and other unwanted programs. It discovered the PremiumSearch threat through its "early warning system".

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
67 out of 163 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Sentry Posts Blog

Working@Home: Keeping Secure

National Work from Home Day has come and gone, with an estimated five million people skiving to enjoy the comforts of their home. However, even though employees sat comfortably, IT... More

Post a comment

Privacy International director launche...

Simon Davies, who has been involved with campaigning on privacy issues for a number of years, is launching a privacy consultancy firm called 80/20. Half of all profits will be donated... More

Post a comment

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation