ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Cyber terrorism 'merely a theory'

Patrick Gray ZDNet Australia

Published: 11 Nov 2003 09:10 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Gartner's information security and risk research director has dismissed cyber-terrorism as a "theory". The comments came during a media round-table session at the Gartner Symposium and IT Expo, which began this week in Sydney. The director, Rich Mogull, told journalists that despite the incidence of high-profile digital attacks, cyber terrorism is a phenomenon that has never occurred.

"The goal of terrorism is to change society through the use of force or violence, resulting in fear," he explained. "I want to put this cyber terrorism thing to rest. It's a theory, it's not a fact."

Even though there were examples of attacks that has physical consequences -- such as the case of Vitek Boden, who was sentenced to two years in prison for releasing up to 1 million litres of sewage into the river and coastal waters of Maroochydore, Queensland in 2001 -- they could not be described as terrorist acts, Mogull explained. To a large extent it comes down to motive, he said.

"If a directed cyber attack on, say, a power system that... resulted in the blackout of an entire nation or a large region and deaths because of that... that would constitute cyber terrorism if they claimed they did this as a terrorist act," he said. "The motive will define what's terrorism and what's not."

Mogull maintains the argument is largely academic -- it doesn't matter who's attacking an organisation, it should be doing the best it can to protect itself in the first place, whether attacks are coming from criminals or "cyber terrorists".

"Let's stop running around being scared about these esoteric threats out there. Let's look at protecting ourselves by closing the vulnerabilities we know exist, and protecting ourselves from the attacks that we know exist," he said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
62 out of 131 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Related Jobs

IT Support Analyst (Remote Access Support) - London

Vacancies exist for IT Support Analyst Job Title: IT Support Analyst (Remote Access Support, Desktop Support Active Directory and exchange) (x4 ...

Strong Academic Oracle Developer.Leading Investment Bank.Progression.

Strong academic Oracle developer required to work within a dedicated and highly-valued team of strong developers. Day to day duties include; engaging ...

Techno-Functional SAP BW Consultant - BI 7.0 Upgrade - London Based, Global End User - Extremely High Profile

Intelligent Trust Recruitment Limited acts as an Employment Agency and an Employment Business). Maintain, monitor and perform optimization of the SAP ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation