ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

UK failing to fight spam

Dan Ilet silicon.com

Published: 12 Aug 2005 09:10 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) has admitted it fails to take legal steps against UK spammers while "successfully" enforcing regulations against 13 fax marketers.

The ICO, the UK's last official port of call to complain about spam, said it had received more complaints about illicit fax marketing than junk email.

In an email to ZDNet UK sister site silicon.com, the ICO wrote: "As breaches of these regulations are not criminal offences there can not be any prosecutions. Putting this into context with other complaints we receive under the same and previous legislation, we receive far more complaints about direct marketing faxes and have been successful in taking enforcement action in 13 cases of breaches by fax companies."

The government details were obtained through a request under the Freedom of Information Act. The ICO's comments follow a report from the department in which it said it required more powers to act against spam but for now the public should complain to their ISPs.

"[T]he commissioner recognises the limits of regulation alone, especially where materials originate from outside the UK. There have been some initiatives to encourage co-operation between the various regulatory authorities — for example, the Information Commissioner has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with other relevant UK bodies and authorities in Australia and the US.

"In the meantime, the Commissioner recommends that individuals take appropriate steps to reduce the risk of getting unwanted email, by seeking advice from their Internet service provider," the ICO said in its annual report.

According to industry sources, the ICO is writing to spammers as a result of 300 complaints deemed 'actionable', to request removal of the complainant's email address from the spammer's list.

Anti-spam campaigner Spamhaus has hit out at the ICO for failing to control spammers. Steve Linford, director of Spamhaus, said: "If I was a spammer I'd love Britain. I can spam as much as I like and I get an office who deals with opting people out of my lists for free; I don't even need to pay staff to do it for me as they're paid by the government.

"The reality is that spammers in the UK can spam the entire country and at the very worst they might get a letter some months later from the ICO asking them to stop spamming Mrs Jones of Richmond."

Linford explained that Spamhaus and ISPs are the only ones stopping spammers, by barring them from sending junk email through their systems.

"The UK's spam law was a waste of time and public money, it urgently needs to be scrapped and rewritten to properly ban spamming and make a ban enforceable," he added.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
230 out of 302 people found this useful


Related Jobs

URGENT - Senior Quality Assurance (QA) Manager - Pharma

You will have extensive pharmaceutical experience and a thorough understanding of Pharma regulations. A fantastic new opportunity to lead a QA - CAPA ...

Flash developer - Action script version

Are you a technically focused Flash developer with strong AS2/3 development skills, OOP and flash animation and video experience? If so I would love ...

Compliance Analyst FSA/TCF 25k-35k West Midlands

You will be applying individual expertise in one or many of the following areas: -life office practice -associated legislation and regulation ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Privacy International director launche...

Simon Davies, who has been involved with campaigning on privacy issues for a number of years, is launching a privacy consultancy firm called 80/20. Half of all profits will be donated... More

Post a comment

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation