ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Teenager admits eBay domain hijack

Martin Fiutak ZDNet Germany

Published: 06 Sep 2004 15:35 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

German police said on Saturday that a 19-year-old from Helmstedt, Lower Saxony, has admitted to hijacking the domain of the eBay Germany Web site and is likely to face charges of computer sabotage, according to ZDNet Germany.

The domain hijack attack happened at the end of August when visitors to the eBay.de site were redirected to a different domain name server (DNS), meaning that they could not access auctions.

According to Frank Federau, a spokesman for the Lower Saxony police, the 19-year-old is not a computer expert. The boy claims to have merely stumbled across Web sites which described how to do a DNS transfer.

He claimed that "just for fun" he requested a DNS transfer for several sites including Google.de, Web.de, Amazon.de and eBay.de. Most of these transfers were denied, but the transfer for eBay went ahead. It is unclear how the domain could have been transferred without the consent of the owner.

The teenager said he did not want to cause damage. Indeed, according to Federau, he was shocked when he was told that he had become the new owner of the eBay.de Web address. The domain has now been returned to its rightful owner.

Ebay stated that user data was not endangered by the domain hijacking.

In May this year another teenager from Lower Saxony was arrested on suspicion of creating the Sasser computer worm that infected millions of computers worldwide. The case against the Sasser suspect is due to start soon.

The full news report (in German) on the eBay domain hijacking can be found here.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
118 out of 235 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Linux System Administrator (RedHat, MySQL, DNS, Apache, RAID, SMTP)- Nottingham, Midlands

Job Title: Linux System Administrator (RedHat, MySQL, DNS, Apache, RAID, SMTP)- Nottingham, Midlands Location: Nottingham, Midlands Salary: Very Good ...

208204EW SMS Analyst - Coventry

Windows 2000, Windows 2003 server - In-depth knowledge of Microsoft Active Directory - Skills in SMS 2003 - Skills in MOM 2005 - Experience of ...

Customer Solutions Engineer / Software Engineer - HTTP, HTML, XML, DNS and TCP/IP,C++, Java, PHP or Python - London, South East

Customer Solutions Engineer / Software Engineer - HTTP, HTML, XML, DNS and TCP/IP,C++, Java, PHP or Python - London, South East The area: Customer ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Privacy International director launche...

Simon Davies, who has been involved with campaigning on privacy issues for a number of years, is launching a privacy consultancy firm called 80/20. Half of all profits will be donated... More

Post a comment

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation