ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Online business Toolkit

Google-DoubleClick deal: A hard sell in Europe

Dawn Kawamoto and Elinor Mills CNET News.com

Published: 22 Nov 2007 12:02 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment
Google-DoubleClick deal: A hard sell in Europe

Google's merger proposal with DoubleClick could face greater scrutiny in Europe than the in the US if antitrust regulators decide the deal takes the companies into new markets.

The European Commission, which announced last week that it has pushed Google's merger proposal into its more rigorous "second phase" review, tends to follow two lines of investigation — current and future markets — when it looks at the antitrust implications of mergers. American antitrust regulators, on the other hand, take a narrower view.

For Google, that means its $3.1bn (£1.5bn) planned merger is likely to pass antitrust muster in the US, but face a much tougher sell in Europe.

"Based on what I've read, this is not an acquisition that will be of great concern to US authorities," said Beth Farmer, an antitrust professor at Pennsylvania State University's Dickinson School of Law. "In my opinion, I think the US will allow it to go through since no one has characterised it as a horizontal merger."

But, in Europe, merger proposals largely fall into one of two buckets. One is a non-horizontal merger, in which two companies in compatible but different lines of businesses seek to expand into new markets by merging, such as AOL's acquisition of Time Warner. The other type of merger is a horizontal merger, in which two companies in largely identical businesses are seeking to capture a larger bite of the market, as in the Oracle-PeopleSoft merger.

US antitrust regulators have largely focused on challenging only horizontal mergers — to the point that US courts have not ruled on a single non-horizontal merger in three decades. That is not the case in Europe.

You have a competitor who is potentially locking up something valuable, and the concern is that the tool set won't be available to others

Dan Wall, Latham & Watkins

Both Google and DoubleClick have ad-serving businesses: Google's AdSense serves ads to sites in its publisher network, and DoubleClick offers an ad-serving and ad-management product called "Dart" for publishers, advertisers, and enterprise customers. But Google's pay-per-click text ads are generated from keyword searches, or based on the context of a website, whereas DoubleClick places banner ads on sites.

DoubleClick recently launched an advertising exchange, a marketplace that matches sellers of inventory, like website publishers, with buyers, such as advertisers or ad networks. And DoubleClick has a search-engine marketing business called "Performix".

As part of its second-phase investigation, the European Commission said it will look at the possibility that DoubleClick could have grown into an effective rival to Google in the online-ad "intermediation" market. It said it will also investigate whether combining "the leading providers of respectively, on the one hand, online advertising space and intermediation services, and, on the other hand, ad-serving technology, could lead to anti-competitive restrictions for competitors operating in these markets and thus harm consumers."

"It's about DoubleClick's tool set and how that plays into Google's business," said Dan Wall, an antitrust attorney for Latham & Watkins, who represented Oracle in its successful bid to win court approval for the acquisition of PeopleSoft. "You have a competitor who is potentially locking up something valuable, and the concern is that the tool set won't be available to others."

If a substantial number of Google and DoubleClick customers say they are going to lose choice and be dependent on one main source, then that will cause the European Commission to oppose the merger, said Ted Henneberry, a lawyer in the antitrust practice at Heller Ehrman in London, who until last year was a member of the Irish Competition Authority.

"The key issue is going to be the extent to which the companies approach the same general market. The Commission will have to wrestle with the issue of: are these, for the most part, complementary vehicles, or are they really competing vehicles? Are they really alternatives for advertisers and websites?" Henneberry said. However, he noted that, if customers say the combination provides one-stop shopping, then that will be in Google's favour.

Although the European Commission has rarely blocked a merger outright over the past decade…

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
3 out of 3 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:











Sentry Posts Blog

Virtual Teams: Small Business Innovati...

Virtual Teams: Small Business Innovation Author: Eric Everson, Founder – MyMobiSafe.com As the founder of MyMobiSafe.com, I’ve found that because of our presence in the industry... More

Post a comment

Mobile Security and Innovation: An Ope...

Mobile Security and Innovation: An Open Case Author: Eric Everson, Founder MyMobiSafe.com The times are changing in the mobile industry as “big wireless” in the US Markets are calling... More

Post a comment

Government launches new e-crime unit

Ok, so this is outside of my main area of focus of sustainable and green tech but I do track some security issues too. I was at a meeting last week with Microsoft's security advisor... More

Post a comment