ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Law Lords: Banks liable for overseas purchases

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 01 Nov 2007 16:21 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The Law Lords have upheld a Court of Appeal decision that banks and credit companies should be liable for overseas purchases where the goods fail to arrive or are faulty.

Business people and consumers purchasing goods from foreign websites, or abroad, will now enjoy the same protection as if they were purchasing in the UK.

The value of goods that fail to arrive will now have to be refunded by credit card providers. Goods with a value between £100 and £30,000 will be covered for overseas transactions under section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, the Law Lords decided on Wednesday.

Sentry Posts Blog

Sentry Posts Blog
Guarding the network

What you need to know — and what you and your peers have to tell us — about security management in our new community group blog

Read more +

The ruling decided a long-running legal dispute between the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) and Lloyds TSB, Tesco Personal Finance (part of The Royal Bank of Scotland group) and American Express Services Europe. In November 2004, The High Court ruled that section 75 of the Act applied only to domestic credit card transactions. However, that protection was then extended by the Court of Appeal to overseas transactions. The credit card providers took an appeal to the House of Lords.

John Fingleton, OFT chief executive, said: "The application of section 75 to overseas credit card purchases has long been uncertain, which is unsatisfactory for UK consumers. We are pleased that the House of Lords has resolved the issue, and particularly happy that it has been resolved in a way that gives greater protection to consumers."

The OFT said that if people pay by credit card they can claim their money back from the credit card company if the seller fails to honour the contract; if the item is faulty; if the seller wrongly describes it; or if the supplier goes out of business. Transactions made by debit and charge cards are not covered by section 75.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
7 out of 7 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:










Related Jobs

Purchasing Vacancies - Midlands - 25,000 - 55,000 +

HUXLEY ASSOCIATES SUPPLY CHAIN & PURCHASING DIVISION: The PURCHASING team at Huxley Associates are currently working on a number of roles that ...

Purchasing Manager - Interim - Derbyshire

A leading Manufacturing Client based in the Derbyshire location is looking to recruit for an Interim Purchasing Manager. The ideal candidate is ...

Purchasing Manager - 40-45K+bonus & car allowance

A passionate Purchasing Manager, keen to further develop their career is required for a Head of UK Strategic Purchasing role based in Banbury. The ...

Sentry Posts Blog

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Google sponsors open source security p...

Google has announced it is to sponsor oCERT, an open source computer emergency response team. In a blog post on Monday, Google security engineer Will Drewry said that one of the... More

Post a comment

Indian officials accuse China of cyber...

China is actively engaged in mapping India's computer networks, according to the Times of India. China is mounting "almost daily" attacks against Indian Government computer systems,... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation