Creative Commons licence upheld by court
Published: 21 Mar 2006 11:50 GMT
A court in the Netherlands has ruled that a Creative Commons (CC) licence is binding in a case brought against a Dutch gossip magazine by an ex-MTV star.
This is one of the first times that the licence — which offers more flexibility than traditional copyright licences — has been tested in a court of law, according to the legal Web site Groklaw.
"The Creative Commons licences are quite new, so there has been very little in the way of case law so far, so this is a significant development," Groklaw reported.
Former MTV VJ Adam Curry sued Weekend, a Dutch gossip magazine, for copyright infringement after the magazine published photos of Curry's daughter without his authorisation. The photos, which Curry had posted on the Flickr photo-sharing site, were covered by CC's Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 licence, which states that while the licensed content can be used freely for non-commercial purposes as long as the source is made clear, the content cannot be used for commercial purposes unless the creator of the content agrees to waive the conditions.
The court ruled that Weekend must not use Curry's pictures again or they would face fines of €1000 (£700) for each photo they used without permission, Curry said in his blog.
Audax, the publisher of Weekend, had argued that it was misled by the notice posted on Flickr by Curry's photos stating that they were 'public' and that the link to the CC licence was not obvious. But the court rejected this defence stating that Audax should have carried out due diligence before publishing the photos, according to Creative Commons Canada, which published a translation of the court ruling.
Creative Commons Canada said the ruling is important as it makes it clear that it is the user's responsibility to find out about and adhere to the licence.
"The Dutch Court’s decision is especially noteworthy because it confirms that the conditions of a Creative Commons licence automatically apply to the content licensed under it, and bind users of such content even without expressly agreeing to, or having knowledge of, the conditions of the licence," said the organisation.
Did you find this article useful?
74 out of 126 people found this useful
Digg
Slashdot
Del.ici.ous
Stumble
Reddit
