Google porn probe gets court date
Published: 27 Jan 2006 10:20 GMT
Google's attempt to fend off the US government's request forms of search terms will move to a federal court in San Jose, California, on 27 February.
US District Judge James Ware on Thursday set the date for the highly anticipated hearing, which is expected to determine whether the US Justice Department will prevail in its fight to force Google to help it defend an anti-pornography law this fall.
Although the Justice Department also demanded that Yahoo, Microsoft and America Online to hand over similar records, Google was the only recipient that chose to fight the subpoena in court. After the spat became public last week, US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said:" This is important for the Department of Justice and we will pursue this matter."
The government's request has raised eyebrows among privacy advocates and members of Congress, some of whom fear it could open the door to future fishing expeditions. Representative Ed Markey, a Massachusetts Democrat, said he would introduce legislation to curb records retained by Web sites, and Senator Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat, has asked Gonzales for details.
Ware also set a date of 6 February for Google to file a legal brief with its arguments, and a 13 February date for the Justice Department to submit its reply.
Ware is no stranger to technology cases. He heard the Sex.com case in 2001, a spam lawsuit in 1998, and a legal spat between RealNetworks and Microsoft in 2004.
Prosecutors are requesting a "random sampling" of one million Internet addresses accessible through Google's popular search engine, and a random sampling of one search queries submitted to Google over a one-week period.
The request is part of the Justice Department's attempt to defend the constitutionality of the Child Online Protection Act. The law orders commercial Web sites to shield minors from materials that may be "harmful" to them. The American Civil Liberties Union claims it violates free expression rights.
Did you find this article useful?
49 out of 92 people found this useful
- Share this article:
