Advertisement
Promo

Online business Toolkit

Survey: Web users ignore illegal content

Jo Best silicon.com

Published: 17 May 2004 16:05 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Internet users aren't up to much when it comes to reporting dodgy content on the Web, research has revealed -- surfers are failing to let the authorities know when they come across content that breaks the law.

Research conducted by ICM Research for the Internet Service Providers' Association (ISPA) found that Internet users were baffled by the legal niceties of publishing content to the Web, with under one-third aware that those who post the content are legally responsible for it.

While those putting up sites with illegal content aren't likely to be too concerned about the consequences of their actions, home and business users might be accidentally risking legal repercussions.

Out of those surveyed, over one-fifth of people surveyed would show other people unlawful Web sites they found -- unintentionally breaking the law -- and one in eight said they wouldn't bother to report it to anyone.

So who should illegal content be reported to? The Internet Watch Foundation has a hotline to report instances of Web sites that break the law. The police are another obvious avenue and ISPs will take down flagrantly illegal content when informed.

But when things aren't so clear-cut -- in defamation cases or copyright infringement, for example -- ISPs have a harder time of it. An ISPA spokesman told silicon.com that where content was harder to judge, ISPs have to balance their legal responsibilities with the needs of customers.

"It's difficult for ISPs to know what to do. They're stuck with this conundrum -- they have to uphold the contract they have with customers and, at the same time, protect their customers' human rights and right to free speech," he said. "If it's defamatory, it will be taken down but ISPs don't have the expertise or authority to decide on that."

ISPA is calling for the government to step in and give them a bit of direction -- at the moment the industry adopts a more self-regulatory approach. The association would like to see a single procedure to decide the illegality of material and a central body to notify them of the results.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
81 out of 163 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Sentry Posts Blog

McKinnon lawyers seek judicial review

Lawyers seeking a judicial review for Nasa hacker Gary McKinnon lodged fresh evidence of his psychiatric state at the High Court on Thursday. Karen Todner, McKinnon's solicitor,... More

1 comment

Beware of keeping your head in the clo...

Information security professionals can look forward to a deepening appreciation for their skills as security continues to be recognised as an essential element for doing business in... More

1 comment

Civil liberties groups attack file-sha...

Civil liberties and digital rights organisations have strongly criticised Lord Mandelson's Digital Economy Bill. Liberty said in a position paper on Tuesday that the bill, part of... More

Post a comment

Video icon

Video

Google Chrome

Roundup: Full coverage of Google Chrome

The search giant has launched a beta of its own open-source browser, sending a clear challenge to Microsoft in the way it lets users work with applications More

Blog: Google Chrome has Microsoft's code inside, says MS manager

And furthermore, he says, that's a good thing... More

Blog: Google Chrome — nine things we've found since launch

Google must be very happy with the coverage Chrome has gathered. But it's not all good news... More


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters