ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Online business Toolkit

Bloggers threaten revolt after Google swaps standards

Paul Festa CNET News.com

Published: 12 Feb 2004 09:15 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Google's Blogger service is bypassing Really Simple Syndication in favour of an alternative technology, in a move that has sparked more discord in a bitter dispute over Web log syndication formats.

The search giant, which acquired Blogger.com last year, began allowing the service's million-plus members to syndicate their online diaries to other Web sites last month. To implement the feature, it chose the new Atom format instead of the widely used, older RSS.

The battle between RSS and Atom has divided the blogging world since the summer, when critics of RSS came together to create an alternative format. Since then, a raft of blog sites and individuals have lined up behind Atom, while Yahoo has thrown its considerable weight behind RSS.

The Blogger decision to offer Atom only has angered supporters of RSS, who accuse Google of helping to splinter a wide network of RSS-using bloggers.

"They're breaking users, including people who aren't using their software," wrote Dave Winer, a Harvard fellow who is commonly considered the arbiter of the RSS format, on his long-running Scripting.com blog. "There is a lot of implicit trust in the RSS network, an assumption that vendors will behave rationally and will care for users. Any participant can break us, as Google is proving. But I believe in the fabric of the community. Either Google will fail, or Atom will be the new syndication standard."

Google confirmed that it is offering Atom syndication capabilities only to Blogger users. But subscribers who once used RSS with paid premium memberships will still be able to do so, it said. The company eliminated paid Blogger subscriptions on acquiring the service from Pyra Labs.

"Google is not taking anything away," a company representative said.

RSS supporters argued that Google could have given members a choice between RSS or Atom, since Blogger already offers the older format. But Atom partisans lauded Google's move, saying it made sense in the context of the company's support for open-source software and open standards.

"RSS has long been controlled by a single vendor or entity," said Mark Pilgrim, an early contributor to Atom. "Atom's an open standard, so people can point at the spec and say they're conforming to it, and it's not controlled by one of their competitors. And RSS is. It's no surprise that the vendors in control of RSS are upset about this. Open standards benefit everyone but them."

Winer directed queries about RSS and Atom to his Scripting.com site.

In the past, Winer has answered charges that he exerted undue control over RSS by pointing to its transfer from UserLand, a blog software company he founded, to the Berkman Centre for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School, where he is a fellow. RSS is also now available for use under a "creative commons" licence, which frees it from commercial copyright claims.

Atom contributor Pilgrim called the Berkman transfer and the licence a "red herring."

"It means anyone can go create their own version of RSS," Pilgrim said. "That doesn't change anything, because the same people are still in charge."

Winer and other RSS supporters urged bloggers to abandon Google's service.

"A good way to provide feedback to the Google people is to switch away from them," Winer wrote on his site, citing a blogger who had suggested RSS supporters bolt from Blogger. "Let them make the connection that the day they started playing unfair, is the day the users started moving away."

Meanwhile, Atom backers are proceeding with plans to bring their technology under the auspices of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). IBM engineer Sam Ruby, who has spearheaded the Atom effort, was scheduled to address O'Reilly's Emerging Technologies conference on a proposal for IETF to assume responsibility for Atom.

Ruby could not immediately be reached for comment. But Pilgrim estimated that Atom, which dates back only to June of last year, would work its way through the IETF and be ratified as a "request for comment" draft no later than August.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
52 out of 117 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Middleware Analyst at Top Financial Company! (WMQ, FTP, UNIX)

Due to team expansion, this company is looking to take on someone to get involved with installing and configuring Middleware systems and supporting ...

Middleware Analyst (WMQ, FTP, Connect Direct)

The main responsibilities are: installs, configuring & customising Middleware systems, co-ordinating upgrades, recommending in writing suitable ...

Project Manager wanted for a HUGE Government project!

I am looking for a Project Manager to handle the transfer of an existing project into 'Business As Usual' ownership. This transfer needs to focus on ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

I wonder, who needs .asia domain? I cannot imagine, what would be useful for Microsoft.asia? Toyota.asia? Then let's register .europe (if .eu is too short). Or perhaps Microsoft.southamerica, Dell.australiaandnewzealand, Coca-Cola.africa... Sound funny? Then why not just use the global and country domains? Or perhaps it is time to drop the domains at all?

By: LadyRoot

Read full story:
Businesses advised to register .asia domains