Advertisement
Promo

Online business Toolkit

Search payments cause a wave of concern for surfers

Stefanie Olsen CNET News

Published: 14 Oct 2003 15:15 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

For example, Inktomi, the largest paid-inclusion provider, operates Index Connect, which lets small and medium-size sites pay a flat annual fee to have their Web addresses regularly indexed. Larger sites such as Amazon.com and eBay -- which typically want assurance that more than 1,000 addresses are indexed -- pay on a sliding scale, depending on the category. These sites can pay anywhere from 15 cents to $1 each time a Web surfer clicks on a listing -- which is akin to the paid-placement model.

In contrast, Google delivers unbiased search results from a vast index of Web sites; the company does not accept fees for cataloguing sites.

Paid inclusion has sparked ongoing concerns that the public might be misled about the independence of search listings, however. While Yahoo argues that paid inclusion produces unbiased, relevant results, search engine experts say that the practice is widely known to give the listings of marketers higher rankings in the index.

"Search engines like to say it doesn't affect the rankings. But there have been cases where rankings on AltaVista and Inktomi were boosted [for marketers that pay]," said Danny Sullivan, an editor of Search Engine Watch, an online industry newsletter.

"It's much more noticeable then it was in the past," he added, even though out of the 1.5 billion Web pages being indexed, only about three million pay to be crawled more often. "The way that it's mixed in with ordinary content can be favourable to [marketers]," he said.

Sullivan added that there's little to no disclosure for these kinds of commercial results.

"Consumers have no idea that this is happening, and at the moment, that's in line with what's the FTC has said -- that paid inclusion doesn't need to be segregated, if there's no boosting happening," he said. "I'd suspect if they were to look at it, and saw that boosting was there, they'd want it to be separated."

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
96 out of 230 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Sentry Posts Blog

McKinnon lawyers seek judicial review

Lawyers seeking a judicial review for Nasa hacker Gary McKinnon lodged fresh evidence of his psychiatric state at the High Court on Thursday. Karen Todner, McKinnon's solicitor,... More

1 comment

Beware of keeping your head in the clo...

Information security professionals can look forward to a deepening appreciation for their skills as security continues to be recognised as an essential element for doing business in... More

1 comment

Civil liberties groups attack file-sha...

Civil liberties and digital rights organisations have strongly criticised Lord Mandelson's Digital Economy Bill. Liberty said in a position paper on Tuesday that the bill, part of... More

Post a comment

Video icon

Video

Google Chrome

Roundup: Full coverage of Google Chrome

The search giant has launched a beta of its own open-source browser, sending a clear challenge to Microsoft in the way it lets users work with applications More

Blog: Google Chrome has Microsoft's code inside, says MS manager

And furthermore, he says, that's a good thing... More

Blog: Google Chrome — nine things we've found since launch

Google must be very happy with the coverage Chrome has gathered. But it's not all good news... More


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters