Advertisement
Promo

Online business Toolkit

Web services standards fail to unite

Martin LaMonica CNET News.com

Published: 05 Sep 2003 15:05 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A technical committee will forge ahead on Thursday with the development of a Web services reliable-messaging specification without the backing of industry heavyweights IBM and Microsoft.

Companies that back the specification -- Fujitsu, Hitachi, NEC, Oracle and Sun Microsystems -- will demonstrate on Thursday how products based on the proposed Web Services Reliability standard can interoperate as designed. The proof-of-concept will take place at a meeting of the Web Services Reliability technical committee of the standards body Organisation for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (Oasis).

Reliable messaging is considered one of the most pressing additions to help drive adoption of Web services, which is a set of industry guidelines for building applications that can easily share information. Reliable-messaging standards are needed to help define how information can be shared between software programs as reliably as within a single application. Analysts said the lack of a single standard could ultimately hinder adoption of Web services.

Despite the need for an industrywide standard, reliable messaging has been marred by rivalries among competing information technology providers.

The Web Services Reliability specification was submitted to Oasis in February for consideration as an industrywide standard. The reliable-messaging function is designed to guarantee that data sent between computers via messages will arrive at the intended destination.

Only a few weeks later, Microsoft, IBM, Tibco and BEA Systems published their own reliable-messaging Web services specification. Microsoft held a meeting in July to garner interest and gather feedback on the rival specification, called WS-Reliable Messaging, which has not been submitted to a standards body.

Overall, Web services standards have been adopted by software providers, and the Web Services Interoperability Organisation has issued guidelines to ensure that products from different providers work together as advertised. However, finding common ground around the more advanced capabilities, including reliable messaging and business process automation, has been more contentious.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
74 out of 161 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:



Sentry Posts Blog

Met will not reopen phone hack investi...

The Metropolitan Police will not reopen its investigation into alleged phone hacking by the News of the World. In a press statement delivered outside Scotland Yard on Thursday, Assistant... More

Post a comment

FUD over ChromeOS's security already?

It hasn't taken long for the security vendors to wake to the potential of Google's new ChromeOS. The potential that is, to create FUD – fear uncertainty and doubt. In a release today,... More

Post a comment

Feds take DDoS in their stride

The US Department of Homeland Security has said that a series of distributed denial-of-service attacks began on US government networks on 4 July. However, Amy Kudwa, deputy press... More

Post a comment

Video icon

Video

Google Chrome

Roundup: Full coverage of Google Chrome

The search giant has launched a beta of its own open-source browser, sending a clear challenge to Microsoft in the way it lets users work with applications More

Blog: Google Chrome has Microsoft's code inside, says MS manager

And furthermore, he says, that's a good thing... More

Blog: Google Chrome — nine things we've found since launch

Google must be very happy with the coverage Chrome has gathered. But it's not all good news... More


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters