Advertisement
Promo

Online business Toolkit

Ford loses hyperlink battle

Wendy McAuliffe ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 31 Jan 2002 14:42 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Hyperlinks should be excluded from domain name disputes, a US judge said this week in a ruling that saw car maker Ford lose its battle to sue the owner of FuckedGeneralMotors.com for directing traffic to Ford.com.

Eastern Michigan District Court Judge Robert Cleland rejected claims that Ford's trademark was being violated by a hyperlink that pointed the domain name FuckedGeneralMotors.com at its own homepage. He dismissed the case on the basis that the trademark was not included in the domain name, which insults Ford's biggest competitor, but rather in the programming code which does no more than create a hyperlink to the ford.com site.

"Programming code, unlike the unauthorised use of a trademark as a domain name, does not inhibit Internet users from reaching the Web sites that are most likely to be associated with the trademark holder," said Cleland. "Trademark law does not permit (Ford) to enjoin persons from linking to its homepage simply because it does not like the domain name or other content of the linking Web page."

Ford had requested an injunction against 2600 Enterprises to prevent it from hyperlinking to its Web site or referring to it in DNS (domain name server) records. It argued that the publishing company actions constituted a commercial use, as it was preventing Ford from "fully exploiting the value of its mark."

The judge rejected claims that the hyperlink sought "commercial" gain. "If the FTDA's (Federal Trademark Dilution Act) "commercial use" requirement is to have any meaning, it cannot be interpreted so broadly as to include any use that might disparage or otherwise commercially harm the mark owner."


For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Telecoms forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
42 out of 92 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Sentry Posts Blog

homer

lets show everyone that labour has compasion[whilst there counting the votes] running upto march/april 2010...http://tinyurl.co...nus very good nb gordon brown said today on our... More

Post a comment

This Crap Site

How utterly stupid - I am ranked #40 in the top 100 - as a member of this site..... I mean HOW utterly stupid.... I have done sweet FA, I have only rejoined this site after a 3 or... More

Post a comment

Microsoft Security Update: November Pa...

Apologies for this late update to our core Patch Tuesday update. Here is a summary of the update .... The November Patch Tuesday update from Microsoft follows the largest patch and... More

Post a comment

Video icon

Video

Google Chrome

Roundup: Full coverage of Google Chrome

The search giant has launched a beta of its own open-source browser, sending a clear challenge to Microsoft in the way it lets users work with applications More

Blog: Google Chrome has Microsoft's code inside, says MS manager

And furthermore, he says, that's a good thing... More

Blog: Google Chrome — nine things we've found since launch

Google must be very happy with the coverage Chrome has gathered. But it's not all good news... More


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters