Advertisement
Promo

Online business Toolkit

Alcoholics Anonymous not awarded .org site

Lisa M Bowman ZDNet US

Published: 11 Jan 2002 12:27 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Owners of the AlcoholicsAnonymous.org Web site have fended off a bid by the international organisation to snatch the domain name, saved in part by a wide-ranging disclaimer on the front page.

Saying the site displayed an adequate warning "which goes much further than an ordinary disclaimer," the World Intellectual Property Organization's (WIPO) Arbitration and Mediation Center said in a recently released decision that it is allowing the owners of AlcoholicsAnonymous.org to keep the name.

The site, which says it once hosted porn, now bills itself as an unofficial AA forum where people can, among other things, sign up for alcoholism-related lists or an AlcoholicsAnonymous.org email account.

Alcoholics Anonymous had filed a claim with the WIPO board, which has the right to transfer domain names from one party to another, alleging the site's owners were violating the organisation's trademark and using the site in bad faith. AA also accused the site's owners, who used a fictitious name, of providing false information when registering the site.

The board, however, sided with the current owners on 28 December, saying they posted adequate notification that the site was not affiliated with AA. Furthermore, the board noted, AA encourages anonymity and a decentralised structure.

Domain name dispute resolution boards side with trademark holders in a majority of cases, making this decision somewhat unusual.

The panel did find the site's owners acted in bad faith by trying to sell the domain name, but the action was not enough to warrant a transfer.

However, the board warned against extrapolating this decision to other cases.

"It has not been easy for this panel to reach a decision and so this panel would be reluctant to have this decision stand as precedent for others unless the unique circumstances were almost precisely duplicated," the WIPO board wrote in its decision.

For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the Telecoms forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
28 out of 87 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:








Sentry Posts Blog

Civil liberties groups attack file-sha...

Civil liberties and digital rights organisations have strongly criticised Lord Mandelson's Digital Economy Bill. Liberty said in a position paper on Tuesday that the bill, part of... More

Post a comment

Authentication risks all too human

Risks to successful online banking identification and authentication using smartcards involve a mixture of human and technological factors, according to the European Network and Information... More

1 comment

Opera censors Chinese content

Opera has updated the Chinese version of its mobile browser to stop users accessing restricted content. Opera Mini was updated on Friday from an international to a Chinese version,... More

2 comments

Video icon

Video

Google Chrome

Roundup: Full coverage of Google Chrome

The search giant has launched a beta of its own open-source browser, sending a clear challenge to Microsoft in the way it lets users work with applications More

Blog: Google Chrome has Microsoft's code inside, says MS manager

And furthermore, he says, that's a good thing... More

Blog: Google Chrome — nine things we've found since launch

Google must be very happy with the coverage Chrome has gathered. But it's not all good news... More


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters