Advertisement
Promo

Online business Toolkit

Government defends new cyber-snooping powers

Jane Wakefield ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 19 Nov 1999 17:22 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The government defended its decision to give police the power to snoop on the Internet Friday, but said it had no hard figures to back up its stance.

On the day the government published its long-awaited E-communications Bill (formerly the E-Commerce Bill), Home Office minister Charles Clarke and e-Minister Patricia Hewitt stoutly defended the decision to push through controversial law enforcement measures, claiming they were urgently needed to "modernise police powers". While law enforcement clauses in the e-communications bill have been removed, snooping policies will still be pursued via the Home Office's Investigatory Powers Bill.

According to Clarke, the need for these measures is a matter of "urgency", with terrorists, paedophiles, drug traffickers and money launderers all using the Internet to perpetrate crimes. Clarke claimed the authorities needed access to encrypted data in order to fight crime. "With the new Investigatory Powers Bill we decided to put all the law enforcement measures in one bill," he said. "While we all want e-commerce to flourish, the very technology that makes e-commerce possible is also being used by criminals, sometimes to devastating effect."

Clarke, however, had no hard statistics to back up his statements. Pointing to the NCIS (National Criminal Intelligence Service) survey into computer crime -- Operation Trawler -- he claimed that the Internet is "increasingly used for crimes" but neither the minister nor NCIS's survey gives any indication of the actual number of crimes happening on the Internet.

It is estimated that it will cost every ISP up to £1m to install the surveillance equipment necessary to give the police access to encrypted emails. Clarke claims the government is currently reviewing these costs but offered no indication that they would be lowered. According to an NCIS spokeswoman the cost is irrelevant, compared to the dangers of Internet crime. "Encryption could cost someone their life," she said. "If there is an encrypted file in relation to a contract killing or the setting up of a paedophile ring someone's life could be in danger."

She was unable to throw light on the numbers of criminals using the Internet. "I don't even know if those statistics exist," she said, claiming the picture would be clearer when the Computer Crime unit was set up.

The cyber crime-fighting unit is due to be created "very soon", the spokeswoman said.

What do you think? Tell the Mailroom . And read what others have said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
59 out of 90 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:













Win a BlackBerry with Vlingo voice recognition

Win a BlackBerry with Vlingo voice recognition

What is ZDNet UK's usual tagline?

Competition closes - 14 Jan 2010

Video icon

Video

Google Chrome

Roundup: Full coverage of Google Chrome

The search giant has launched a beta of its own open-source browser, sending a clear challenge to Microsoft in the way it lets users work with applications More

Blog: Google Chrome has Microsoft's code inside, says MS manager

And furthermore, he says, that's a good thing... More

Blog: Google Chrome — nine things we've found since launch

Google must be very happy with the coverage Chrome has gathered. But it's not all good news... More


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters