Advertisement
Promo

Processors Toolkit

IBM's 35 atoms and the rise of nanotech

Stephen Shankland CNET News

Published: 29 Sep 2009 15:53 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

When IBM researcher Don Eigler picked up and moved the first individual atom 20 years ago today, he paved the way for what arguably was the smallest publicity stunt ever: IBM's logo made from a precise arrangement of 35 Xenon atoms.

But moving tiny atoms had big consequences by making the idea of assembling devices atom by atom very real. And the company has built on that nanotechnology foundation, storing information on specific gold atoms, collecting carbon monoxide molecules into computer logic circuits, and pursuing a vision for vastly more compact computing technology.

Despite the progress, Eigler is cautious about when or even if his ideas for computing will bear fruit.

"We did the introduction, and we're in chapter 1," Eigler said. "This is way off in the future, if it ever comes about. I cannot conceive, under the best circumstances, this is going to happen in 10 or 15 years."

IBM logo atoms
 
Don Eigler moved the first individual atom 20 years ago, and shortly afterwards wrote 'IBM' with 35 Xenon atoms
 

Eigler, now an IBM fellow, said he was "boggled" that day he moved his first atom with an IBM device called a scanning tunnelling microscope. He programmed the system to make the move, then held his breath while his screen went blank during the actual operation.

"You can't see it while you actually move it. Then you see the picture come in and say, 'Yes, it's there'," Eigler said. He moved the atom back and forth three times to make sure it really worked: "For us, that's [a] sort of sacred thing. The key thing and most important thing about science is reproducibility. If you can't reproduce your own result, you might as well forget it. It's as if you'd never done it."

Shortly after that, in November 1989, Eigler arranged the 35 atoms to spell IBM. There was, of course, publicity in it for the company, but Eigler had no complaints. For one thing, it demonstrated that IBM really could control atoms with atomic-scale precision and that its work was not just a fluke. For another, Eigler was grateful that IBM let him pursue his work.

"It was more than a publicity stunt. Emotionally, for me, it was much more important. This is going to sound hokey, but it's the truth. IBM picked me up off the scrap heap of science and gave me every opportunity a scientist could hope for to be successful," Eigler said. "As far as I was concerned, it was payback time."

No mass manufacturing
Eigler and colleagues have been working on the technology since but, so far, the benefits have been indirect. That is because moving and studying atoms with a scanning tunnelling microscope and its offshoot, the atomic-force microscope, is a far cry from assembling computing devices that operate at much larger scales.

"Being able to put atoms together with atomic-scale precision at a level that allows you to deliver a marketable product is something that is largely hope and vision for our future," Eigler said. "We are not there yet."

There are other directions of nanotechnology research: Eigler gave graphene and topological insulators as possibilities. Eigler, however, remains excited to pursue his own long-term vision for computers that process information without today's reliance on the movement of electrons.

Specifically, he is interested in using the quantum mechanical property called spin for computing. The conventional conception...

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
10 out of 10 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. Very Good Tezzer

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Win a Teufel Cinebar 50 system

Win a Teufel Cinebar 50 system

What is ZDNet UK's usual tagline?

Competition closes - 14 Jan 2010

Video icon

Video

Discussions

ator1940 ator1940

Microsoft Loses Patent Case Appeal

Friday 25 December 2009, 9:35 PM

6 comments
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Google it

Friday 25 December 2009, 1:40 PM

3 comments
J.A. Watson J.A. Watson

Google it

Friday 25 December 2009, 1:38 PM

3 comments
Shibley R Shibley R

Question!

Friday 25 December 2009, 11:09 AM

3 comments

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters