ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Enterprise open source Toolkit

Intel bets on open source future

Matthew Broersma ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 08 Aug 2005 16:45 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Xen is already supported in some form in SuSE Linux Professional 9.3, Debian and NetBSD, and Red Hat's Fedora Core 4 is to ship with Xen included. Xen version 3, which began testing in June, will add multiprocessor support.

Hardware security
The flip side of platformisation is that some of Intel's planned systems put an emphasis on hardware-supported security systems that would be difficult or impossible for open-source software to support. For several years open source developers have been keeping an uneasy eye on Intel's LaGrande hardware security system, the counterpart to Microsoft's widely criticised Palladium plan (now known as Next Generation Secure Computing Base).

Now aspects of LaGrande, such as the use of Trusted Platform Modules to enforce copy restriction, or digital rights management (DRM), are to be integrated into an upcoming consumer-oriented desktop platform known as East Fork.

Such developments have been met with dismay by the open source community. "We're wary of oncoming developments like 'East Fork', which we consider bad for consumers and dangerous for independent developers," says Eric Raymond, a noted open-source developer. "Universal DRM would be a disaster for consumers; they would no longer control their own machines, and the competitive pressure that Linux puts on Microsoft and the big media companies would end." However, Raymond notes that so far Intel has put such technology on the market without trying to force people to use it, and may continue down the same path.

Until now, Intel's main contribution to the open source world has been to commoditise 32-bit hardware, which gave the open source community an inexpensive, open standards platform to build on, Raymond says. He thinks the company's recent, more active approach should be welcomed, though with a few reservations. "I think we'd be quite happy with Intel as a neutral, simply supplying chips and open specifications," he says.

"Mostly what we want from them is that hardware prices keep dropping, and that they not collude with bad actors like Microsoft or the MPAA, RIAA and DVDCCA, who want to make open source impossible."

Next

Previous

1 2 3 4


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
236 out of 453 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

1 comment

  1. Labor costs are a big deal for me too. Whenever I... Anonymous

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Technical Architect - EDS

Responsiveness and effectiveness in dealing with non-routine requests - Demonstrable evidence of contribution to continuous improvement ...

LINUX / UNIX Systems Analyst - Canterbury

Job Title: LINUX / UNIX Systems Analyst - Canterbury Salary: 33,780 - 41,545 (pay award pending) You will take the lead in delivery of key services ...

Systems Engineer

An in-depth knowledge is essential since emphasis will be placed on proactively identifying and implementing network/system enhancements. The use of ...

Featured Talkback

Its the applications and device drivers that run on windows that cement its dominance. How many people would fork out hundreds of pounds for Vista if Linux ran all the software and kit they wanted to use.

By: pround

Read full story:
Windows' dominance stifles demand for Linux

Discussions

harpless harpless

Viacom's motives

Friday 4 July 2008, 6:46 PM

1 comment
PiotrIr PiotrIr

Storage for Hyper-V

Friday 4 July 2008, 4:28 PM

1 post