IBM reaches nano-computing breakthrough
Published: 20 May 2002 08:38 BST
IBM researchers have created transistors out of carbon nanotubes that can outperform similar silicon transistors, a development that helps build the case that carbon may one day become a building block of computing.
In an article to be published on 20 May in the journal "Applied Physics Letters", IBM researchers outline how transistors made of carbon nanotubes -- long, thin strands of carbon molecules -- delivered more than twice the amount of electrical current at a faster rate than cutting-edge transistors made from silicon and metal, the basis for chips today.
Increased current leads, potentially, to faster transistors and integrated circuits. And since transistors and integrated circuits are the building blocks of chips, the results imply that carbon could someday become the foundation for tomorrow's computers.
"They outperformed silicon transistors," said Phaedon Avouris, manager of nanoscale science at IBM. "There are a number of (performance) improvements."
Although it's in its infancy, nanotechnology could, over the ensuing decades, become crucial to a wide array of industries, say advocates and many researchers. Nanotechnology is essentially the science of building things on a molecular level. General Motors is currently trying to develop stronger materials for cars using methods from nanotechnology.
In high tech, IBM, HP and other companies are experimenting with these techniques to build microscopic circuits. Eventually, these circuits could be used to create inexpensive sensors for detecting gas leaks or other environmental hazards, or, 20 years or more down the line, small data storage devices or computer chips.
Why all the hype about carbon nanotubes? Computer processors are becoming so dense with circuits that many believe traditional methods of designing and making chips will become economically untenable in 15 to 20 years.
Because, with nanotubes, the molecules arrange themselves into patterns like snowflakes, individual chip circuits would no longer have to be drawn -- a drastic change that would dramatically drop the labour, factory and equipment costs in the semiconductor industry.
Performance would also improve because of the way electrons travel across the tubes, said Avouris. In traditional wire circuitry, designers have to deal with resistance, i.e., forces and obstacles that slow down electrons. Through resistance, electrons get scattered, which causes heat and lost energy.
By contrast, nanotubes are extremely thin and long, so thin, in fact, that electrons can't be deflected sideways. Electron flow can be stopped or reversed, but it's like stopping an atomic train.
"The collision has to be very strong to reverse the direction of the election. In principal, there are not many things that are strong enough to do that," Avouris said. "You only have two directions of propagation."
Theoretically, nanotubes would allow engineers to build chips that would require less electricity (because less is lost in transmission) or could deliver more performance with an equal amount of energy.
Of course, the benefits are still hypothetical. Reseachers, for instance, recently determined that there is an energy barrier of sorts at the thin, contact end of the tubes that doesn't occur with standard silicon transistors. The ability of molecules to arrange themselves has also not fully been plumbed.
"The basic science is still not totally understood," Avouris said. "Nature does use self-assemble, but Nature had a research and development time of over 2 billion years."
Creating carbon nanotubes remains a long, difficult process. Carbon Nanotechnologies, a start-up out of Rice University, grows the tubes in a chemical bath by placing a metal particle inside of carbon-heavy petrochemical bath. After everything gets heated to more than 1,000 degrees centigrade, freed carbon molecules begin to form a strand off of the metal.
IBM then acquires the strands from Carbon Nanotechnologies and inserts them into its own chips.
To find out more about the computers and hardware that these chips are being used in, see ZDNet UK's Hardware News Section.
Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the Chips Central Forum.
Let the Chips Central editor know what you think by email. And sign up for the weekly Chips Central newsletter.
Did you find this article useful?
55 out of 97 people found this useful
- Share this article:
