Advertisement
Promo

Processors Toolkit

Intel, HP say Merced will be EPIC

Lisa DiCarlo ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 15 Oct 1997 10:41 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Merced, the first Intel processor to incorporate the 64-bit architecture, will be delivered in 1999. Intel and HP jointly described an architecture dubbed EPIC. The acronym stands for the four properties that will make up a big piece of IA-64 -- explicitly parallel instruction computing. HP manager and lead architect Jerry Huck described EPIC as a successor to CISC and RISC.

A big contributor to the performance of IA-64 processors is overcoming problems with things like parallelism, prediction and speculation.

To simplify the concept, Huck gave a bank analogy. For example, he explained that if a customer walks into a bank, a teller would be able to predict what type of transaction the customer wants. This means that the customer (or system, as it were) will not waste time waiting to be told what transactions to execute.

IA-64 will boast "explicit parallelism" which exposes, enhances and exploits parallelism and makes it explicit in the machine code.

The word Merced was mentioned only once during the presentation, when Intel fellow John Crawford said Merced would be the first processor to incorporate IA-64. Although both HP and Intel did not provide market positioning information, they said IA-64 will address enterprise transaction, decision support, graphical imaging and volume rendering applications among others.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
10 out of 59 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:






Win a Teufel Cinebar 50 system

Win a Teufel Cinebar 50 system

What is ZDNet UK's usual tagline?

Competition closes - 14 Jan 2010

Video icon

Video

Discussions

NoThomas NoThomas

Sure I can

Saturday 26 December 2009, 2:01 AM

11 comments
NoThomas NoThomas

It does not need clarification...

Saturday 26 December 2009, 1:30 AM

10 comments
ator1940 ator1940

Microsoft Loses Patent Case Appeal

Friday 25 December 2009, 9:35 PM

5 comments

Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters