Advertisement
Promo

Desktop platforms Toolkit

Workstations aren't PCs, SGI warns Compaq

Martin Veitch ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 07 Aug 1996 14:23 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

As Compaq made its official announcement of the new Workstation Division today, Silicon Graphics UK desktop product manager Martin Baines commented on the PC giant's chances in an interview with PC Daily News.

What do you think of Compaq's move into the workstation market?

All they're really doing is reorganising and refocussing on what they are doing already. There has already been a move of high-end PCs impinging on low-end RISC workstations. They'll find that it's not just a case of having hot tin. There will have to be a recognition that you have to change the way you sell and change your channels. A lot depends on how they get their sales channels sorted out. The market is typically looking for integration and you need a channel that understands that.

What else will Compaq have to change, in terms of the differences between selling PCs and selling workstations?

The internal processes have to be right. PC support is hotlines, and if a system breaks you send out another one, but with workstations the problems are more complex.

What about the fact that they'll run Pentium Pro/Windows NT rather than the RISC/Unix flavour combination of 'classic' workstation vendors?

Relying on another company for your operating system (OS) could lead to long lead times. Problems may not get fixed until the next OS release. It's not the 80 per cent of problems, it's the other 20 per cent where you need access to your own source code. That's something that's going to arise for those gnarly problems.

What sort of threat does Compaq represent to SGI and other companies in the workstation arena?

Any company, ourselves included, would be pretty naive not to consider a company the size of Compaq as a threat. They are a valid organisation to come into the workstation space. We're probably less at risk than some; we have a much bigger smear towards advanced graphics users. Strategically, Sun, Hewlett-Packard and IBM stand to lose the most. They're most exposed at the low-end where there is overlap with PC capability.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with EPSON

Did you find this article useful?
50 out of 68 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Video icon

Video

Microsoft Windows 7 Special Report Special Report

How Microsoft can make Windows 7 a success

How Microsoft can make Windows 7 a success

Comment Many businesses have given Vista a wide berth; Microsoft must focus on five areas to make sure Windows 7 doesn't suffer the same fate, argues TechRepublic's Jason Hiner

More Special Reports

Win a Creative Zen X-Fi2 player and accessories

Win a Creative Zen X-Fi2 player and accessories

What is ZDNet UK's usual tagline?

Competition closes - 14 Jan 2010

Desktop Management Benchmarking

Test Your Desktop Management Systems

How good are your company's desktop management solutions? How do they compare with those of your peers?

Take two minutes to complete our new Desktop Management and Energy Consumption benchmark, and find out what issues your business needs to focus on.


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters