ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Emerging tech Toolkit

Freeserve customer gets slapped with £500 bill

Wendy McAuliffe ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 22 Jun 2001 16:40 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Freeserve customers paying a monthly subscription fee for unlimited Internet access could be unwittingly running up massive telephone bills.

One distraught reader alerted ZDNet News UK to the problem when he received a £500 telephone bill for Internet access, three months after subscribing to the "Freeserve Anytime" package. The monthly subscription charges that Freeserve was debiting from his bank account should have covered all charges for the free Internet access that he was receiving.

The customer in question was not informed that he needed to insert a six-digit prefix in front of the number downloaded from the Freeserve installation disk, in order to avoid incurring extra charges.

"Freeserve has admitted that this prefix was not displayed anywhere on the site or on any paperwork, and unless you had prior knowledge of call charges, there was no way of knowing that this prefix was to be used," he told ZDNet.

The wording that appears on the Freeserve Anytime configuration instructions makes no reference to this six digit prefix number. But there is a warning that reads "it is essential that you carefully read and follow all three steps on this page, or you risk being charged for your Internet calls (for which Freeserve cannot be held responsible)".

The principal lawyer at the Consumers' Association, Ajay Patel, said the small print in any contract is regulated by unfair contract terms rules. "The small print must be legible, in plain English, and anything onerous has to be brought to the attention of the customer." In the case of this complaint, the clause that Freeserve is relying on may be deemed unenforceable if it is too buried in text, meaning that the customer would be eligible for compensation.

"Of course, if we are at fault, we will reimburse him," said a Freeserve spokesperson.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the Telecoms forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read other letters.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
41 out of 70 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:









Discussions

Richard A Johnson Richard A Johnson

I can believe this

Thursday 21 August 2008, 1:16 PM

1 comment
Richard A Johnson Richard A Johnson

Sensitive Data Leaks

Thursday 21 August 2008, 1:02 PM

1 comment
45272 45272

Watering it down?

Thursday 21 August 2008, 11:04 AM

1 comment
nikhilmishra3 nikhilmishra3

India's IT Growth Story

Thursday 21 August 2008, 8:07 AM

1 comment

Blog Posts

Avatar PeterJudge

Novell - Microsoft deal extended

Wednesday 20 August 2008, 9:14 PM

0 comments
Avatar Tom Espiner

Transys comment speculation

Wednesday 20 August 2008, 5:54 PM

0 comments

Featured Talkback

While full medical records may be of (dubious) value at rear/base medical facilities, these could be provided much simpler by either physical disk or electronic transfer to an "in theatre" database for individuals posted in. That £80m (and it's associated running costs) could have been far better employed in resuscitating a disbanded infantry battalion or providing a big boost in equipment quality and quantity.

By: 1000215420

Read full story:
Photos: MoD unveils £80m IT health programme