ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Emerging tech Toolkit

A Year Ago: Twenty three sacked for email abuse

Jane Wakefield ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 03 Dec 2000 07:02 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The NYT sacks 23 for sending rude emails about the boss, UK legal expert warns of more to follow

The dangers of Net use at work were highlighted again this week as the influential New York Times sacked 23 of its office staff Wednesday for sending "offensive" emails.

In the UK, there have been several "sacked for surfing" cases in the last year -- a council worker and a IT manager were fired for spending too much time on the Web -- experts suspect there are hundreds more that never get publicised.

According to a New York Times spokeswoman the sacked employees were violating both company and federal policy. "The content was offensive and inappropriate. Creating a hostile work environment is illegal in America and employers are required to take action," she said. Although she refused to give details of what employees were sending, she claimed the company acted correctly. "It was serious and violated our company values. Our email policy is quite clear and it was sent to all employees four months ago," she said.

Robin Bynoe partner with City law firm Charles Russell, doubts the sackings were justified. "It appears that the employees in the New York Times case were sending rude emails about the bosses. It is questionable if being rude about the boss is a sackable offence." Bynoe reckons bosses are overreacting. "People who run companies aren't used to the Internet or email and are frightened of not being able to control it. In most cases they are making fools of themselves," he said, adding that some bosses are using email abuse as a pretext for getting rid of troublemakers.

Bynoe thinks the whole issue raises questions about privacy, with current practise weighted heavily in favour of the employer. "People seem to believe employees can't use their systems for any personal use and that they have the right to monitor everything," he said. Bynoe predicts a spate of court cases as employees realise their bosses are interfering with their privacy.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Click on the TalkBack button and go to the ZDNet News forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
48 out of 81 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:












Discussions

1000030281 1000030281

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Sunday 20 July 2008, 2:33 AM

1 comment
roger andre roger andre

SP3 Under Suspicion Again

Saturday 19 July 2008, 9:29 PM

2 comments

Blog Posts

Avatar roger andre

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Saturday 19 July 2008, 7:54 PM

1 comment
Avatar geek

Windows Vista

Friday 18 July 2008, 7:58 PM

0 comments

Featured Talkback

While full medical records may be of (dubious) value at rear/base medical facilities, these could be provided much simpler by either physical disk or electronic transfer to an "in theatre" database for individuals posted in. That £80m (and it's associated running costs) could have been far better employed in resuscitating a disbanded infantry battalion or providing a big boost in equipment quality and quantity.

By: 1000215420

Read full story:
Photos: MoD unveils £80m IT health programme