ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Emerging tech Toolkit

Government backtracks on Internet surveillance

Will Knight ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 27 Jun 2000 15:44 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The government tabled amendments to a controversial cyber-surveillance bill Monday that would weaken its snooping powers but may prevent more serious changes from being made.

Home Office minister Charles Clark yesterday promised that the suggested amendments to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Bill would reduce the burden on companies to hand over encryption keys. He also said that amendments would clarify the cost of the bill to ISPs and to the business community.

As it stands, the bill would give law enforcers the right to access Internet traffic and communications and imprison those who do not hand over encryption keys.

The amendments are aimed at helping the Bill through the House of Lords where it has received rough treatment.

Some opposed to the bill, however, say that while this may be a step in the right direction, RIP needs more fundamental changes. "There has been some progress but there is still a lot of information outstanding," says Caspar Bowden, director of the Foundation for Information Policy Research. Bowden says the devil is in the detail and thinks the power the bill gives law enforcers to demand long-term encryption keys from companies is still there.

"It's basically a bit of a blood bath and I'm still trying to work out what the effects are," he says.

Others are nevertheless encouraged that the government is listening to there concerns. In an open letter to be published today, Chris Humphries, director general of the British Chambers of Commerce, which commissioned a report criticising the business costs of RIP, welcomes the amendments.

"The amendments that the Home Office has put forward for debate in Lords committee stage will, if accepted, go a long way towards meeting the concerns of industry with regard to the RIP bill. These amendments deal with a number of key concerns that the BCC has raised," he says.

What do you think? Tell the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

They can see you... Read about how and why in Surveillance, a ZDNet News Special.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
54 out of 99 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:













Discussions

1000030281 1000030281

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Sunday 20 July 2008, 2:33 AM

1 comment
roger andre roger andre

SP3 Under Suspicion Again

Saturday 19 July 2008, 9:29 PM

2 comments

Blog Posts

Avatar roger andre

Facebook Bans Firefox 3

Saturday 19 July 2008, 7:54 PM

1 comment
Avatar geek

Windows Vista

Friday 18 July 2008, 7:58 PM

0 comments

Featured Talkback

While full medical records may be of (dubious) value at rear/base medical facilities, these could be provided much simpler by either physical disk or electronic transfer to an "in theatre" database for individuals posted in. That £80m (and it's associated running costs) could have been far better employed in resuscitating a disbanded infantry battalion or providing a big boost in equipment quality and quantity.

By: 1000215420

Read full story:
Photos: MoD unveils £80m IT health programme