ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Emerging tech Toolkit

Wiretapping may cost ISPs £17m - report

Will Knight ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 26 Apr 2000 10:17 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Wiretapping the Internet -- in accordance with the government's controversial Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Bill -- will cost Britain's 400 ISPs at least £17m in the first year, with the total cost to both ISPs and the government rising to around £30m according to a report published Thursday.

Commissioned by the government, the Smith Report, entitled "Technical and Cost Issues Associated With Interception of Communications at Certain Communication Service Providers" outlines three possible ways ISPs could intercept email communications to meet the protocols laid out in the RIP Bill.

Government policy think-tank the Foundation for Information Policy Research (FIPR) judges this to be a conservative estimate and suggests ISPs could end up forking out around £20m with the cost to Britain's economy escalating to as much as £34m.

Caspar Bowden, Director of FIPR says in a statement: "The Government has been telling us for weeks that the million pound price-tags put on interception were just scare-mongering. Now their own consultants think it will be more than £30m and that's only the beginning before the next wave of broadband e-commerce is rolled out in 2001, with 3rd generation mobile Internet (UMTS) following in 2002."

Responding to Bowden's concerns, a Home Office spokesman points out that the report is by no means indisputable. "This is an independent report to better inform our discussions with the ISP industry," he says.

He adds that the Home Office will continue its dialogue with ISPs in order, "to determine what interception capabilities ISPs should enable and where the burden of cost should lie. It's still very much open to discussion."

In related news, the Internet Service Provider?s Association (ISPA) last week sent an open letter to Alex Allan, the E-Envoy, expressing its serious concerns about the role of ISPs in providing the interception facilities required by the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Bill.

What do you think? Tell the Mailroom. And read what others have said.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Dell

Did you find this article useful?
40 out of 66 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:














Related Jobs

Learning Zone Developer

It adds up to a worthwhile challenge offering real autonomy with the UK's leading professional association for nurses. With over 385,000 members and ...

Production Services Analyst- North West

The ability to understand the critical business processes and their association with key services in order to assist in Urgent Incident resolution ...

Site Systems Integration Manager

The Shell Group and its approved recruitment consultants will never ask you for a fee to process or consider your application for a career with ...

Discussions

harpless harpless

SAP goes big business

Friday 25 July 2008, 6:17 PM

1 comment
pjc158 pjc158

Will Drizzle rain on Sun's MySql

Friday 25 July 2008, 5:30 PM

1 comment
pjc158 pjc158

Show me the money!

Friday 25 July 2008, 5:18 PM

5 comments

Featured Talkback

While full medical records may be of (dubious) value at rear/base medical facilities, these could be provided much simpler by either physical disk or electronic transfer to an "in theatre" database for individuals posted in. That £80m (and it's associated running costs) could have been far better employed in resuscitating a disbanded infantry battalion or providing a big boost in equipment quality and quantity.

By: 1000215420

Read full story:
Photos: MoD unveils £80m IT health programme