Surveillance: An open letter to Jack Straw

How the E-commerce Bill could send YOU to jail...

Please find at the end of the letter a confession to a crime, which has been affirmed by Statutory Declaration. The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police has been informed that you are in possession of this information.

You will not be able to understand the confession, because the words have been scrambled using a strong cryptographic key. This key was created in your name and has been registered on international public key servers.

The police may come and demand that you supply the key required to make this message intelligible. If you fail to do so you would be committing an offence under the E-Commerce Bill rendering you liable to imprisonment for up to 2 years.

The fact that you don't possess this key won't help you unless you can prove that you don't have it. I wish you well in proving that it isn't hidden away on a disk in your secretary's home, or squirreled away on the Internet somewhere. We might have sent it to you last week; but according to the Bill, the police won't have to prove you ever had it at all.

Even if you can prove that you don't have it you would STILL be liable for imprisonment unless you give information to the police that enables them to decrypt the key. Unfortunately for you this is impossible, because we've destroyed all copies of the key in our possession.

If the police ask you keep the demand to hand over the key secret, telling anyone would render you liable to five years in jail.

So you couldn't complain, or explain your predicament, to the PM or Home Secretary, to the Chief Whip or a journalist, or even to another policeman.

Happily for all of us, the E-Commerce Bill has not yet been enacted by Parliament, so we have not in fact set you up for jail time. The Bill will be introduced in the coming session. I hope this exercise has demonstrated some of the drafting flaws in the Bill as it stands, copies of which are available from the DTI.

I hope we have also demonstrated that it is not the perpetrators of crime who would suffer under these draconian new powers, but innocent parties who are in receipt of communications from miscreants. This is why such sober organisations as BT, Hewlett-Packard and Microsoft have publicly criticised the Bill at each stage of its development.

I trust that when the Bill reaches the House we can rely on your most careful scrutiny. Further analysis is available on our web site at: http://www.stand.org.uk/.

I am, Sir, Your most obedient servant,