ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

ISP Panix over domain hijack

Steven Musil CNET News.com

Published: 17 Jan 2005 08:30 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A New York Internet service provider said on Sunday it was working to recover its domain name and email services after suffering an apparent hijacking.

A Panix.com representative said ownership of the domain had been moved sometime on Friday evening to a company in Australia, the domain name server (DNS) records had been moved to the United Kingdom, and that the company's mail had been redirected to a company in Canada.

"We are pulling our hair out here," said the representative, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The company warned that most customers will either have no access to the Panix.com domain or will arrive at a false site. Email to the domain is being directed to the false site and "should be considered lost or compromised", the ISP said in its posting.

It is unclear how the domain could have been transferred without the consent of the owner, and the representative expressed frustration with the domain registrars.

"The registrars have not been as cooperative as common sense would dictate," the representative said.

As a temporary workaround, the company suggested using the Panix.net domain in place of the Panix.com domain. The company said that it was working around the clock to recover the domain, but warned that may not happen until Monday due to time zone differences.

In September, German police said a teenager had admitted to hijacking the domain of the eBay Germany Web site. The domain hijack attack happened at the end of August when visitors to the eBay.de site were redirected to a different DNS, meaning that they could not access auctions.

Panix, which was founded in 1989, provides Internet access and email services to New York City, Long Island, Westchester, Rockland County and New Jersey.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
62 out of 154 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Related Jobs

208204EW SMS Analyst - Coventry

In addition you must also be able to recover server instances in the event of a major failure. Experience of domain structure & directory ...

Systems Administrator - Unix/Linux/Websphere - York - 35000

Enterprise System Administrator -York. They currently require an experienced Enterprise Systems Administrator to join their team based in York. My ...

Unix System /Applications Administrator - UNIX, Shell, PHP, Perl or Python - London, South East

Pittsburgh, PA/ Seattle, WA and Sydney, Australia. Unix System /Applications Administrator - UNIX, Shell, PHP, Perl or Python - London, South East ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation