ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Jobs
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Mobile devices Toolkit

Qualcomm accused of anti-competitive behaviour

Jo Best silicon.com

Published: 31 Oct 2005 09:20 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

A number of the biggest names in the mobile industry have lodged a complaint with the European Commission accusing Qualcomm of anti-competitive behaviour.

Companies including Ericsson, Nokia and Qualcomm's arch-rival Broadcom filed the complaint on Friday, which alleges Qualcomm has violated EU competition law with regards to the use of its 3G patents.

The six companies behind the complaint have told the EU they believe Qualcomm is not licensing its "technology on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms" and have called on the EU to investigate the company's business practices.

Qualcomm is an intellectual-property powerhouse in the mobile industry, having pioneered the CDMA technology behind most 3G networks, and also sells chipsets that go in phones.

Qualcomm's pricing structure in particular has drawn the ire of the other mobile vendors. The six — also including NEC, Panasonic and Texas Instruments — labelled Qualcomm's chipset pricing "excessive and disproportionate", due to the lack of discrepancy in cost between W-CDMA and CDMA2000 royalties.

The patent for CDMA2000 is exclusively owned by Qualcomm, while W-CDMA, a different flavour of 3G, is only partially derived from Qualcomm's technology. With every 3G handset sold, Qualcomm gets a royalty payment.

However, according to the company's accusers, no matter which version of 3G is used, Qualcomm receives the same royalty.

The six mobile companies also alleged Qualcomm has been acting anti-competitively by preventing other mobile chipset makers from entering the market. They accuse Qualcomm of offering lower prices to handset makers that buy exclusively from them and refusing to license their technology to competitors at fair rates.

The end result, say the six mobile companies, is higher prices and fewer choices for consumers.

San Diego-based Qualcomm failed to respond to a request for comment at the time of publication.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendlyPrint with Konica

Did you find this article useful?
71 out of 138 people found this useful



Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:
















On The Road Blog

Virtual Teams: Small Business Innovati...

Virtual Teams: Small Business Innovation Author: Eric Everson, Founder – MyMobiSafe.com As the founder of MyMobiSafe.com, I’ve found that because of our presence in the industry... More

Post a comment

Mobile Security and Innovation: An Ope...

Mobile Security and Innovation: An Open Case Author: Eric Everson, Founder MyMobiSafe.com The times are changing in the mobile industry as “big wireless” in the US Markets are calling... More

Post a comment

Can a monkey save my iPhone?

Becoming increasingly frustrated with my iPhone's battery life I am turning to the only thing a man in a fix can count on - a monkey - and not just any monkey - this one is a Power... More

2 comments

Discussions

dshgsjki dshgsjki

Come On!!!Newest & Popular Nike sports...

Wednesday 8 October 2008, 12:12 AM

1 post
dshgsjki dshgsjki

2008 Newest & Popular sport shoes in w...

Wednesday 8 October 2008, 12:07 AM

1 post
roger andre roger andre

The quest for a Mexican netbook

Tuesday 7 October 2008, 9:15 PM

1 comment