Advertisement
Promo

Network management Toolkit in association with http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;216302359;14453422;v?http://www.citrix.com/lang/English/lp/lp_1688615.asp

Faster FireWire on way for gigabit generation

Colin Barker ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 31 Jul 2008 12:53 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The IEEE has approved the new IEEE 1394-2008 specification that gives support for better bandwidth of up to 3.2Gbps — the standard that is used by Apple's FireWire and Sony's iLink, among others.

Most commonly called FireWire, it was initially intended as a general-use fast serial bus, but has found niches in attached storage and multimedia applications, primarily because of its guaranteed latency.

Like many standards, the issue for IEEE 1394 is maintaining compatibility across different generations, and ensuring that the protocol keeps up with advances in hardware technique. Many implementations are still using the 400Mbps S400 specification, even though the 800Mbps S800 standard has been available for some time.

VIDEO

Dialogue Box
Dialogue Box 6.8: Top tech trumps

What are likely to be the most important tech stories over the next few months? Rupert and Charles discuss the contenders

View full video+

The IEEE on Wednesday announced that it had formally approved the IEEE 1394-2008 spec, which will introduce support for S1600 (1.6Gbps) and S3200 (3.2Gbps) while offering full backwards compatibility with S400 and S800 ports. The IEEE 1394-2008 spec will become available in October, according to the IEEE.

FireWire's main competitor is the Universal Serial Bus (USB), which is more widely used in desktop and mobile applications and is less expensive to implement. It is currently on version 2.0 with a top speed of 480Mbps, with 3.0 due out in 2010 at a mooted fastest rate of 4.8Gbps. There has been some controversy over USB 3.0: the standard is being driven by Intel, with other partners in the USB industry group complaining that key details of the new specification have been withheld from them, thus leaving them at a competitive disadvantage. Intel denies these claims.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
13 out of 13 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Citrix Resources

Achieving the lowest server virtualisation TCO

Consolidation through server virtualization is a powerful agent for datacenter change, but...

Achieving the lowest server virtualisation Total Cost of Ownership

Consolidation through server virtualization is a powerful agent for datacenter change, but...

Citrix XenDesktop: The Best Desktop Delivery System For Today's Demanding Business Needs

Whether you're considering your first virtual desktop solution or trying to salvage an existing...

Desktop Virtualisation: A buyer's checklist

Desktop virtualization should do more than just move desktop management to the datacenter—its real...

Five reasons why you need Citrix Essentials for Hyper-V now

This paper explores common challenges associated with server virtualization deployments and the...

Accelerate Business through a Cost-efficient Virtual Workforce

This white paper defines a virtual workforce, describes the challenges and requirements that...

See All White Papers

Video icon

Video

On The Road Blog

Logitech Bluetooth Mouse M555b

Last week I wrote about The RIght Mouse for the Job, and mentioned that Logitech had a new Bluetooth mouse which was not yet available in Switzerland. Sure enough, a couple of days... More

Post a comment

Ubuntu Netbook Remix "Acid Test" - Wra...

Time to wrap up one more open item - my informal "Acid Test" of UNR. The size of my test group has doubled (from one to two), and the results have been consistent. The conclusion... More

Post a comment

Sony goes in-between with the W-Series...

Last December, UK Vaio chief Nicolas Barendson told ZDNet UK that Sony wouldn't do netbooks in their current form factor, because such devices were in-between products that were neither... More

1 comment


Skip Sub Navigation Links to CNET Brand Links

Help

Become part of the ZDNet community.

Newsletters