ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


Mobile working Toolkit

Drowning in wireless spaghetti

Rupert Goodwins ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 01 Nov 2005 13:00 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

...every territory adopted different frequencies and signalling protocols and was thus mutually incompatible. Europe decided to use TDD for GSM, the first 2G phones; America had a variety of technologies reflecting its much more fragmented market, but settled on CDMA for its 2G system.

There are also various ways that the information can be encoded for transmission, quite separate from the way the frequencies are selected and used. Each decision affects a number of factors: power consumption, how many transmitters can operate in a particular area, how far the transmission reaches, how resistant a signal is to interference, how much data can be carried, how easy it is to interleave voice and data and so on.

Maximum confusion
This was the background against which the International Telecommunications Union decided to start its IMT-2000 project, which aimed to create a single third generation (3G) standard for the world unifying TDD, FDD, CDMA under one banner. After 10 years, it created not one but five standards — CDMA-TDD, CDMA-FDD, CDMA, CDMAx3 and TD-SCDMA, which have largely been deployed along regional lines and have acquired second or even third names in a successful effort to spread maximum confusion.

The major European 3G standard is called W-CDMA (W for Wideband — it's really CDMA-FDD — but it's also called UMTS and GSM ). America's CDMA networks have moved to 1xEV-DO (Evolution Data Only) for 3G, which is part of a different development called cdma2000. China is using TD-SCDMA, which has Chinese intellectual property in it.

And if that's not enough, there is absolutely no agreement over what 4G might be. There are signs that UMTS-TDD is trying to acquire that name, but as the standard is part of the 3G specification suite this is pure marketing spin. Beware of anyone claiming 4G — they're not, and will not for years to come.

For a glossary of wireless standards, click here...

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Did you find this article useful?
269 out of 510 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




On The Road Blog

Ofcom to consider customer termination...

Mobile operators already charge each other termination charges -- now Ofcom has called for opinions as to whether end users should be charged. Interesting articles both in the Register... More

1 comment

The Redfly 'Notbook'

When is a netbook (or mini-notebook) not a netbook? When it's a 'notbook' such as Celio's Redfly Mobile Companion, that's when. You might have thought that the idea of a netbook-format... More

1 comment

Nathan Barley's magic hotzone

Via an interesting post on Absolute Gadget, I learned of BT and Fon's plan to distribute 1,000 routers in Shoreditch, East London. The idea, it seems, is to create what BT like to call... More

Post a comment