ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Locking down your wireless network

Jonathen Yarden

Published: 25 Apr 2005 18:30 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Years ago, at a computer show during the dot-com boom, I stopped by the booth of a now-defunct high-speed wireless network provider and inquired about the security of the vendor's wireless networks. Specifically, I questioned the inherent insecurity of the 802.11a standard, the prevalent wireless networking specification at the time.

The engineer who was staffing the booth assured me that the company's wireless access was indeed secure, yet he failed to explain how or why. It was more than apparent that he scoffed at the idea that I would even ask such a question — particularly with potential customers present — and he seemed to want nothing more than for me to walk away.

Of course, the booth was quite elaborate, complete with fancy A/V displays and everyone working the booth dressed in sharp suits. But their appearance belied their inability to understand the security of their own products.

However, while most of us recognise the fact that looks are deceiving, appearance still appears to be everything to a whole lot of people. So I'm happy that the well-dressed agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation recently were able to conclusively demonstrate how insecure the majority of wireless networks really are. In addition, the agency announced that even 802.11b wireless access with WEP encryption — widely touted as the secure replacement for the 802.11a standard I was so concerned about years ago — is just as insecure.

I sincerely hope this satisfies those people who insist that a suit and tie are prerequisites for knowledge of security information. It took the FBI literally three minutes to demonstrate how to break WEP encryption and gain access to a secured network.

The FBI's findings should serve as a warning to organisations currently using wireless access, and it might prevent some companies from using wireless networks entirely. Regardless, companies need to be more aware of the critical role that security plays in wireless networks.

Whatever comes of the FBI demonstration, it's important that companies fully understand this concept: Unless you've deployed end-to-end data encryption, communication is never really secure, no matter how well-secured the wireless network. Despite advances in wireless technology, the security of a wireless network will never equal that of a wired network.

Next

Previous

1 2


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
119 out of 233 people found this useful


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Wireless Support Engineer 35,000 Cheshire

My client, a regional leading wireless provider is currently looking for a talented wireless engineer, day to day duties would include: Cisco ...

Wireless Sales - Communications Technologies North West

My client, a regional leading wireless provider is currently looking for a talented wireless communications salesman to promote their product ...

NHS Safeboot (encryption) Consultant

Are you an experienced user of SafeBoot management Center? Have you used it within the NHS Connecting for Health Project? If your answers to the ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation