ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Network management Toolkit

Intel outlines its ultrawideband position

Rupert Goodwins ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 13 Nov 2003 12:25 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Ultrawideband, one of today's most exciting areas of communications, may be in deep trouble due to that perennial problem for any emerging technology -- vendors squabbling over standards. 

This high-speed, low-power method of wireless connectivity has the potential to revolutionise the way that electronic devices talk to each other, but the companies at the forefront of bringing it to market can't agree on a fixed UWB standard.

On one side, backed by Intel, is the Multiband-OFDM Alliance (MBOA) with its Orthogonal Frequency Division Modulation (OFDM) technology. The opposing group is Motorola/XtremeSpectrum. Concern is growing that the two rival and incompatible camps at the centre of the disagreement may pursue separate UWB standards. This could confuse the market and delay acceptance, setting the development of very high-speed personal wireless networks back by years.

ZDNet UK caught up with Intel’s co-director of Wireless Technology Development, Ben Manny, the day after he attended the IEEE 802.15.3a meeting where once again the ultrawideband (UWB) standards process stalled.

What happened at the Albuquerque meeting?

There’s still a deadlock. The way it should work is that you select one proposal, and then you need a majority of 75 percent to move on when you poll the group for concerns about the proposal. During the process of the confirmation vote, if you vote 'no', you need to state what you would accept to change your vote to 'yes'. At the next meeting, the group that wins gets to come back with the changes, and you vote again. If you don’t get the confirmation vote, you go back to before the selection, and we’ve already been through that two times.

Some companies use some of this openness and fairness for purposes for which they weren’t originally intended. You always question where some of the consultants are coming from when they block the process. This is what’s happening.

Next

Previous

1 2 3


  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
163 out of 328 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:




Related Jobs

Embedded High-Speed Real-Time Control Systems Designer Hemel Hempstead

My client is looking for an Embedded Software Engineer with experience of C and Assembler software design for real time high performance control ...

Ruby on Rails Expert required at Property Group London

A role creating a cutting edge bespoke management application using a combination of technologies including Ruby on Rails, ...

Computer Forensic Manager

You will be involved in assisting the forensics team in a broad range of cases including fraud investigations, employee misconduct, intellectual ...

On The Road Blog

Mobile Surfin’ USA

If everybody had a mobile – across the USA… OK, I’ll stop there. Actually, I’m not much of a Beach Boys fan. But betwixt a number of US-based events as I am, I think I’m more acutely... More

Post a comment

Gizmo Adds Business Enhancements and M...

Gizmo5 (formerly The Gizmo Project) has been my preferred program for IM text chat and audio calls (including PSTN calls worldwide) for quite some time now. The chat interface is clean... More

Post a comment

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment