ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Mobile working Toolkit

NTT DoCoMo accused of reverse domain name hijacking

Matt Loney ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 09 Jul 2002 15:50 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Japan's NTT DoCoMo was accused by a panel convened by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) of attempting to reverse-hijack the imode.biz domain name after it lost its case to win the name from US telecoms giant AT&T.

The accusation was delivered in a ruling by WIPO's arbitration panel, which found that AT&T had not registered imode.biz in bad faith and furthermore that in failing to disclose relevant information to the panel, the complaint was a case of attempted reverse domain name hijacking.

A case of reverse domain name hijacking was decided on even though AT&T did not seek this, said the panel. The reason for this was that in bringing its case, NTT DoCoMo failed to disclose the (otherwise widely publicised) fact that it had a significant investment in AT&T. Under the terms of this investment, AT&T was granted "licences to all DoCoMo know-how, technology and intellectual property rights related to i-mode mobile multimedia services (up to and including 3G) as it is developed; sole use of the i-mode brand in the USA, and other know-how developed for mobile multimedia services."

AT&T registered the imode.biz domain name on 27 March this year. NTT DoCoMo, which created the i-mode service, filed its complaint against AT&T with WIPO in April under the Start-up Trademark Opposition Policy and Rules that govern disputes in the .biz domain. Although the panel found that NTT DoCoMo clearly has rights to the imode and i-mode trademarks, it said both parties had a legitimate interest in the domain name. Under the .biz dispute procedures, NTT DoCoMo would have had to demonstrate bad faith on AT&T's part, but in the opinion of the panel it failed to do so.


For everything Internet-related, from the latest legal and policy-related news, to domain name updates, see ZDNet UK's Internet News Section.

Have your say instantly, and see what others have said. Go to the ZDNet news forum.

Let the editors know what you think in the Mailroom.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with Kyocera

Did you find this article useful?
54 out of 108 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments

Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:








On The Road Blog

Mobile Rockstar: Guitar Hero Going Mob...

Mobile Rockstar: Guitar Hero Going Mobile? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com If you have found yourself compulsively obsessed with that four key plastic guitar from the famed... More

Post a comment

iPhone heaven/iPhone hell

Steve Jobs owes me nearly two hours of my life back. Or at least he would do if I wasn't so chuffed with the iPhone that finally became mine after a bum-achingly long period propped... More

3 comments

The App store spells death to Jailbrea...

I'd love to say that the quality of Apps on the Apple App store is so superior to those made for jailbroken iPhones that no one would bother jailbreaking anymore. However, this is definitely... More

6 comments