ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Web casino blacklisted for 'messageboard spam'

Will Sturgeon silicon.com

Published: 05 May 2006 15:45 BST

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

Online casino 888.com has again been linked with the problem of messageboard spam, with one industry body blacklisting the company for what it calls "unethical marketing techniques".

The problem appears to be not with the direct actions of 888.com itself, but with its affiliates, who profit from revenue sharing agreements when they drive traffic to the casino site. In order to do so, many affiliates appear to have taken to using Web crawling technologies — known as spiders or bots — to locate messageboards or chat forums and spam them with links to 888.com and other online casinos.

As a result, industry body the International Gaming Affiliate Marketing Initiative (iGAMI) has blacklisted 888.com and its affiliate schemes, claiming it has breached its code of practice.

Although iGAMI is a small, self-appointed body with no direct authority over the gaming industry, the action of the group which is looking to clean up the tarnished reputation of affiliate marketing underlines the need for casinos to crack down on the way their brands are being promoted.

Brian Nank, chief executive of iGAMI, told ZDNet UK sister site silicon.com 888.com was first blacklisted in January 2006 for 10 days. He added the body has now reinstated the sanction for a period of no less than one year.

A statement from iGAMI said: "We discovered numerous instances of blog and forum spamming where domains owned and operated by Cassava Enterprises [888.com's parent] were being impermissibly promoted on unsuspecting Web sites."

888.com declined to comment.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
76 out of 140 people found this useful


Full Talkback thread

0 comments


Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:







Related Jobs

Senior C++ Developer- London (Gaming) - Perm

High Calibre C++ Developers required by a leader in the gaming industry based from their office in North London. The successful candidate will be ...

QA Team Leader - Gaming client - West London - to 45,000

Great opportunity has arisen at my market leading Gaming client based out of their UK office, for a QA / Test Team Leader to lead a team of 10 QA ...

C++ Software Developers - MFC and Gaming experience - Coventry

The main skills required revolve around C++ gaming knowledge, other desirable skills would be C++, MFC and mathematics. The company are constantly ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation