ZDNet UK


Skip to Main Content

ZDNet.co.uk - Winner of Best Business Website 2007
  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Blogs
  4. Reviews
  5. Prices
  6. Resources
  7. Community
  8. My ZDNet

 

ZDNet UK RSS Feeds


IT Jobs

Security threats Toolkit

Hackers attacked parliament using WMF exploit

Tom Espiner ZDNet.co.uk

Published: 23 Jan 2006 13:35 GMT

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly
  • Post Comment

The British Parliament was attacked late last year by hackers who tried to exploit the WMF flaw within Windows, security experts confirmed on Friday.

MessageLabs, the email filtering provider for the UK government, told ZDNet UK that targeted emails were sent to various individuals within government departments in an attempt to take control of their computers.

The attack occurred over the Christmas period and came from China, according to Mark Toshack, manager of antivirus operations at MessageLabs, who added that the emails were intercepted before they reached the government's systems.

"The attack definitely came from China — we know that because we log the IP addresses. The UK Government was targeted but none [of the emails] got through. No-one was affected — they were attacked but they [the government] didn't know about it until we told them," said Toshack.

The vulnerability with the way that WMF images are handled by Windows was discovered in November 2005. In a WMF attack, exploit code is hidden within a seemingly normal image that can be spread via emails or instant messages.

The first exploit code targeting the flaw was detected on 29 December, but Microsoft did not issue a patch until 5 January, after a security research released his own, unofficial patch.

The attack occurred on the morning of 2 January, before Microsoft's official patch was available. The hackers tried to send emails that used a social-engineering technique to lure users into opening an attachment containing the WMF/Setabortproc Trojan.

The Trojan, had it been downloaded, would have allowed the attackers to view files on the PC. The hackers may also have been able to install keylogging malware, said Toshack, enabling attackers to see classified government passwords.

The attack was individually tailored, and sent to 70 people in the government, according to MessageLabs. It played on people's natural curiosity by purporting to come from a government security organisation. The Trojan was hidden as an attachment called "map.wmf".

The body text of one of the emails read:

"Attached is the digital map for you. You should meet that man at those points separately. Delete the map thereafter. Good luck. Tommy"

The hackers could have been successful if the emails had reached their destinations, said Toshack. "It's like something you get from spooks — you can think 'I'm suddenly an MI5 agent.' You can see how it could work — it plays on people's romanticism about spies," Toshack suggested.

Speaking last November, Alan Paller, director of the SANS Institute, claimed that the Chinese government was employing malicious hackers.

"Of course it's the government. Governments will pay anything for control of other governments' computers. All governments will pay anything. It's so much better than tapping a phone," Paller told ZDNet UK.

Toshack could not confirm whether the Chinese government had been involved. "It is a Chinese hacker gang. I don't know if it is the Chinese government, and I don't know if it's the Chinese government paying a hacker gang," he said.

According to a Home Office source, the government is concerned about the threat posed by Trojan attacks. A Home Office spokesman would not confirm or deny an attack took place over Christmas.

"We do not comment on security matters, but have had discussions with many governments and computer emergency response teams from around the world on the matter of targeted Trojan attacks," a Home Office spokesperson told ZDNet UK.

The attempted attack on Parliament was first reported by The Guardian last week.

  • Email
  • Trackback
  • Clip Link
  • Print friendly Print with HP

Did you find this article useful?
169 out of 281 people found this useful



Company/Topic Alerts

Create a new alert from the list below:





Related Jobs

Oracle BI Business Analyst

You will need to map the processes of the current system and ensure the process used with the new system are in line with the business requirements. ...

Agile Development Manager

They operate in 120 countries and are experts in consulting and development of bespoke solutions targeted at improving client profitability and ...

Senior Manual Tester, Worcester, up to 35k

If you are a strong manual tester who has recently gone into automated testing and have reached a point in your career where you want to stand up and ...

Sentry Posts Blog

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Busines...

Mobile Linux Better For Mobile Business Apps? Author: Eric Everson, MyMobiSafe.com As mobile Linux is carving it’s footprint on the future of mobile application development, the... More

Post a comment

DWP downplays security breach

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has admitted that some of its staff have been forwarding passwords with password protected material. An email that was leaked on the 'Dizzy... More

Post a comment

How many headshots does one chairperso...

We got a strange request last week from the head of PR from Russian security experts Kaspersky. It seems although the company was very happy with the interview we recently carried with... More

Post a comment

Featured Talkback

On the contrary, if vendors were forced to stand behind their products it should increase innovation. It would force more, and better , testing before hitting the sales floor, resulting in fewer updates and less downtime for the consumer. At present the EULA removes responsibility from the vendor, and moves it to the user, which is a step backward. Make the vendor responsibility for their code.

By: ator1940

Read full story:
RSA: Vendor liability may stifle innovation